Kim Min-ha said, "與 will face criticism of the de facto neutralization of South Korea when the special inspector 'Mengtang conclusion' is made."

Jang Sung-cheol
- Do not go to the special inspector's vote...There is too much pressure on both sides. It is good for both sides to meet ∀, Han Dong-hoon, and Chu Kyung-ho and reach an agreement to conclude 'Mengtang'

Kim Min-ha
- Special Inspector Han Dong-hoon will face de facto criticism of neutralization
- The launch of the second annex cannot resolve concerns..Common sense response to the 尹's position

◆ [YTN Radio SHINYUL's news]
■ Broadcasting: FM 94.5 (17:00-19:00)
■ Air date: October 24, 2024 (Thursday)
■ Proceedings: Shin Yul, Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy at Myongji University
■ Dialogue: Jang Sung-chul, Director of Public Opinion Center, Kim Min-ha, Current Affairs Critic

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

◆ Shin Yul: Shin Yul's news head-to-head match, part 1 begins. As I said earlier, we'll start with politics Kim & Chang. It's been 2 weeks since I invited him. Jang Seong-cheol, director of the Public Opinion Center, is here.

◇ Jang Seong-cheol: Hello. I'm sorry.

◆ Shin Yul: Hey, don't mention it, Kim Min-ha, a current affairs critic, is here. Hello?

■ Kim Min-ha: Hello.

◆ You can't skip like this. You didn't come out last time.

■ Kim Min-ha: Well, I always have a perfect attendance award.

◆ Shin Yul: I thought you'd say that, but there's only time over there. I thought you would.

■ Kim Min-ha: It's not an important issue, is it? Director Jang Sung-chul always says, "Even if an article comes out, an article comes out like this."

◆ Shin Yul: No, but let me ask you about that first. I think I met with representative Han Dong-hoon and floor leader Choo Kyung-ho this morning, but there was talk about having a tea time. What is it? Special Inspector, shall we go to that vote? You don't want to go?

◇ Jang Sung-chul: It appears that he's not going. I'm not going to go because both sides have too much pressure. If the vote was put up, the result that representative Han Dong-hoon wanted came out. So, if a majority of the lawmakers say, "Yes, let's decide on the special inspector's party platform," then floor leader Choo Kyung-ho's leadership as floor leader falls to the ground. If we say, "Since the Democratic Party of Korea is not appointing a director of the North Korean Human Rights Foundation, we should make the appointment first through negotiations and then recommend a special inspector," representative Han Dong-hoon's authority and leadership will fall to the ground again. Both are minus games. Why are you doing this? So it's good for both sides to meet, agree and negotiate smoothly, and conclude that they don't even go to a vote.

◆ Shin Yul: When you say Maengtang, what is the conclusion of Maengtang?

◇ Jang Sung-chul: The floor leader is like this. I will continue to negotiate with the Democratic Party of Korea and quickly recommend the director of the North Korean Human Rights Foundation. We will prepare a special inspection team properly. I'll recommend it together and pass it at the plenary session. I'll try harder. What would CEO Han Dong-hoon say?

◆ Sin Yul: How do you watch it? Our critic, Kim Minha.

■ Kim Min-ha: If things go as you said, CEO Han Dong-hoon will actually be in a situation where there are no noodles anymore. Didn't you take it with curiosity in the meeting with the President of Yoon Suk Yeol in the first place? If President Yoon Suk Yeol accepts such a proposal, among the three demands, the special inspector as a means to get to the bottom of the suspicions related to First Lady Kim Gun-hee so that we can prevent the Democratic Party from attacking the special prosecutor. If this is not accepted, it can be passed accidentally even if the Han Dong-hoon system does not necessarily move systematically. Don't you have to give me a justification? Didn't you go to persuade him like this? But what did the president of Yoon Suk Yeol say? If you said you would pass the special prosecution by standing on the side of the opposition party, the People's Power lawmakers answered, "I have no choice, then I have no choice." So you were brutally rejected anyway, right? If you look at the shape, CEO Han Dong-hoon can't pick up the words again, so the special inspector issue was that I would continue to recommend the so-called director of the North Korean Human Rights Foundation, and I would continue to push for it without linking it. As you said, if we make a compromise and virtually converge on the original president's preference and the proposal that floor leader Choo Kyung-ho insisted on, won't it have the effect of putting the knife back into the sheath? Then, the opposition party criticized Han Dong-hoon for taking out the three major demands in order to avoid a special prosecutor, but anyway, it is not meaningful to carry out a special inspector, but by compromising even that, some critics would say that it has been virtually neutralized. Then, I think it would be a little hurt in many ways because we could face criticism about what we have done so far.

◇ Jang Sung-chul: So now, if it fizzles out and we conclude a fierce debate, it's just going to hurt the face, but if this is what floor leader Choo Kyung-ho thinks with the vote, we won't actively pursue this as a party theory first. Then, representative Han Dong-hoon was not recognized by lawmakers as party leader. So the presidential office or the Yoon nuclear officers can provide an excuse for you to step down. It's the same as one arm falling off. So, it's a matter of choosing whether to hurt your pride or one arm will fall off, but it's not that important to risk your political life. So it seems a little unreasonable to actively argue for this.

◆ Shin Yul: You said it's not an important issue, but there's a forest fire right now. Isn't it like you're trying to pull the fire with that rip-off, but you're breaking this rip-off?

◇ Jang Sung-chul: No, you can see it like that, but basically, when the special inspector passes, the people and the opposition parties do that. That's really good. You just have to listen. That's why you're right. But that's not what my professor said. But if you do something wrong with this, your passport could be in a big conflict and conflict, so don't risk your life too much with this. That's what I want to say.