Perjury but no perjury teacher...Lee Jae-myung and Lee Jae-myung were "sniffed" by the prosecution. [Y transcript]

■ Host: Anchor Na Kyung-chul, anchor Lee Se-na
■ Starring: Lawyer Park Sung-bae, lawyer Lim Joo-hye

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN New Square 2PM] when quoting.

◇Anchor> What counter-argument do you expect the prosecution to make when the first trial's acquittal is a blow?

◆Lim Joo-hye> The offense and defense has changed, I think it can be evaluated like this. Since the acquittal came out, appeals from the prosecution are expected to inevitably follow. Considering the weight of what the prosecution initially demanded, it asked for three years, which can be considered the highest sentence. However, this time, the prosecution seems to have no choice but to lead the case to an appeal trial because the ruling came out as completely innocent, that is, innocent. As pointed out earlier, Kim Jin-sung, who actually testified like this at the court this time, was sentenced to a fine, but there was perjury.

However, although there was perjury about whether Kim Jin-sung did this voluntarily or what he did as a doctor, the prosecution seems to have no choice but to attack this part because it believed that the person who asked for it was not charged with perjury. First of all, there is a person who perjured, and there was no need to perjure while the intention, purpose, or profit from it was not confirmed. Nevertheless, if he perjured, this part was Lee Jae-myung's teacher. The prosecution seems to have no choice but to refute this part through an appeals court once again. It can be evaluated that going to the appeal trial is a natural step from the prosecution's point of view.

Excerpted from
: Lee Sun Digital News Team Editor

#YRecord