In response to a question from the office of Park Chan-dae of the Democratic Party of Korea, the legislative investigation office said that the December 3 emergency martial law did not meet practical and procedural requirements.
He then evaluated that since the power of the National Assembly cannot be restricted even in martial law, if the martial law army entered the National Assembly to interfere with the parliamentary resolution process or if the police controlled the entry of lawmakers into the conference hall, it seems to be in violation of the Constitution.
In addition, he added that the academic community's general view is that Paragraph 1 of the Declaration, which prohibits all political activities, is unconstitutional and illegal, and that according to the Supreme Court precedent, the unconstitutional and illegal declaration is invalid.
The National Assembly Research Service analyzed that if martial law forces are deployed to the National Election Commission and steal election-related data, it could also be interpreted as violating constitutional provisions on martial law or warrantism.
※ 'Your report becomes news'
[Kakao Talk] YTN Search and Add Channel
[Phone] 02-398-8585
[Mail] social@ytn.co.kr
[Copyright holder (c) YTN Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution and use of AI data prohibited]
Politics
More- Increasing number of "pro-impeachment" within the ruling party... "Early Retreat" Han Dong-hoon Strategy Disruption?
- Ministers bent down..."Coups" vs "high-level acts of governance"
- Presidential Office to cooperate with voluntary submission... "Response to law and previous government practices."
- Chairman of the National Assembly "Invoking the right to investigate the martial law"... Will Yoon be issued an order to accompany him?