Yoon "Should've sent 1,000 people to the National Assembly"... What he said to his staff at the underground bunker meeting [Y Record]

■ Host: Anchor Park Seok-won, Anchor Um Ji-min
■ Starring: Lee Jong-geun, current affairs critic, Seo Yong-ju, head of the Political and Social Research Institute

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN New Square 10AM] when quoting.

◆ Anchor
However, according to the testimony of military officials identified by the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, it is the resolution room after President Yoon was approved to lift martial law. It is said that he said that the place with the highest security among security, there, should not have sent 500 people and should have sent 1,000 people. Then, in the end, isn't it contrary to the fact that the minimum number of troops were sent for safety within the National Assembly?

◇ Seo Yong-ju
So it's a waste of time for us to refute this. So it's like a noise that harms the calmness of this daily life for the people who are listening to this. Why should I be listening to lies? I told you there were no more than 500 people. 1,000 people. And the strike point hit the National Assembly, not declaring an emergency martial law due to a disturbance in a certain province. However, the National Assembly must exercise its vote on the illegal martial law, and actions have already been taken to prevent the exercise of the authority. In Pangyo, there was a conspiracy about the armoured brigade part. I told them to push them to the tank. But why are you raising the public's anger index by lying nonsense? What a bad president.

◆ Anchor
And there was additional testimony, and President Yoon Suk Yeol ordered four people to come out one by one, and this specific method of arrest was also mentioned.

◇ Lee Jong-geun
[Voiceover] Right. It's probably the most controversial part, whether it's the Constitutional Court adopting witnesses in court or the Constitutional Court or the court of general criminal law actually being prosecuted for investigation. As I said earlier, I personally don't understand the fact that the president personally called and took the lead. Because the president is a civilian. I'm a civilian, and if martial law is legitimate, I'm definitely against it.Even assuming Ma is legitimate, this is a military operation. Isn't it an operation to mobilize the military? Then, in fact, the military's operation is not something that the president can give instructions such as how many people he or she does himself or where to go.

◆ Anchor
But the president is also the commander-in-chief.

◇ Lee Jong-geun
It's different from commanding the military and instructing several people to go on several floors. There is a YTN president, and can the CEO say, "How many people do you want to put in the press office, how many anchors, how many do you want to do?" Can the CEO say this? It's similar to that. You can take responsibility for making decisions overall, but you have to leave the military's operations and practical detailed operations to the military. Civilian-turned-presidents call on several floors, 1,000 people go, and 500 people go. Then, for example, you can give instructions to the defense secretary or the martial law commander.

Isn't there a lack of troops overall? You can express your opinion, but if the commander-in-chief sends a few people to a certain area or a certain area and gives detailed instructions, wouldn't there be a lot of ridiculous instructions for a commander who has been in charge of operations in the Operations Division all his life? If so, it's one of the two. Either the president has intervened in too much detail or the current testimonies are actually to lower his sentence. This is an assumption. I'm not lying to lower my sentence, but I also think we should distance ourselves from the amount of testimony that is pouring out now.

Excerpted from
: Yoon Hyun-kyung, Editor of the Digital News Team

#YRecord