■ Starring: Shin Ji-ho, former Vice-President of the People's Power Strategy Planning, former Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Hyung-joo
* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN NewsNOW] when quoting.
◇Anchor> I think the ruling party's mood will be complicated over the arrest of the president, but I will also look at the situation of the Judiciary Committee yesterday. At yesterday's Legislation and Judiciary Committee, Chung Chung-rae, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, was briefly crippled. Let's watch the video to see what he said.
◇ Anchor> Jeong Cheong-rae, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, used so many extreme words and received media attention for it, but this time, referring to the word death penalty, the People's Power lawmakers said, "Don't worry." What does it mean?
◆Shin Ji-ho> The mockery stories were so similar to words, but it is absurd to say anything in that it is a remark to make at the official meeting of the National Assembly Judiciary Committee and as the chairman of the Judiciary Committee presiding over the meeting. He's not even a judge himself. Whether or not the crime of rebellion is established will be revealed during the trial, and even if it is established, the sentencing will be determined by the nature of the crime, and the death sentence will be sentenced in that way. Are you cursing, what is it?
And that's just the old story of a politician who always causes trouble, Jeong Cheong-rae, and the point is that the Democratic Party of Korea and the opposition party remove the crime of rebellion from the reason for the impeachment, and that's where this started, right? And the Democratic Party's continued punting is not excluded from the reason for the impeachment.
It remains the same, but regardless of whether the act of criminal rebellion against the act of rebellion is established, whether the act of rebellion was unconstitutional, violation of the Constitution, and that is all I will do. I read the impeachment motion, which is a few dozen pages long, and it makes no sense without rebellion.
So at least the Constitutional Court should make a good judgment on that part. Moreover, I am concerned that if the crime of rebellion is removed at a time when the Constitutional Court is making a decision, it may not be accepted and accepted by the public, but rather it may be a catalyst for spreading division.
◇Anchor> "Did you violate the constitution after being judged only for violating the constitution on the act of emergency martial law?" "We will not accept the criminal law's judgment on the charge of violating the crime of rebellion," and Chung Chung-rae, chairman of the committee, has been fighting for several days now. If you look at the words of Chung Cheong-rae, the president will be impeached even if the crime of rebellion is excluded. So, don't worry that the people's power lawmakers will be retaliated, should we see this as a comparison to the extreme word of death sentence?
◆Kim Hyung-joo> Basically, what the Constitutional Court does anyway is violate the Constitution, so did the president do something that could put down the presidency? In fact, according to the lawyer of the National Assembly's prosecution, the expression itself is written as an act of national constitution, which is equivalent to the crime of rebellion. The Constitutional Court asked me if it was a crime of rebellion. This problem seems to have occurred when the National Assembly said it would not fight for the crime of rebellion as to whether or not to argue for the crime of rebellion.
On the one hand, it looks like a pun to the public. So it was said that it was an act of national constitution similar to a civil war. Someone pointed out earlier that Rep. Shin.If you look at it in person, the passed resolution and the prosecution say it's a crime of rebellion. So, it is true that the legitimacy of the prosecution of the Democratic Party and the National Assembly is being destroyed considerably.
◇ Anchor> Hong Joon-pyo, the Hong Joon Pyo, criticized, "If you take out black bean noodles from black bean noodles, is it black bean noodles?"
◆Kim Hyung-joo> On the one hand, however, the Constitutional Court actually has a variety of issues. It is made by reducing it to two out of one or five of the first impeachment bills when it is put on the second impeachment, and there is no change in the contents of the National Assembly. That's what happened when we were in groups.Ma is saying that the Constitutional Court will fight it out enough, and that it will be sorted out. So, naturally, the Constitutional Court seems to have settled its position that it only needs to contend with the various martial law situations, the situation entering the National Assembly, and whether the forced pressure on politicians itself has done enough to dismiss the president.
Excerpted from the conversation: Lee Sun Digital News Team Editor
#YRecord
※ 'Your report becomes news'
[Kakao Talk] YTN Search and Add Channel
[Phone] 02-398-8585
[Mail] social@ytn.co.kr
[Copyright holder (c) YTN Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution and use of AI data prohibited]