尹's defense lawyers who ran the same logic as the conspiracy theory [Y Record]

Constitutional Court Adopts NEC CCTV as Partial Evidence at the Time of Martial Law
Inquiry on the facts of Chinese clerks' list before and after the 2020 general election
Constitutional Court, Military Entrance, and Claims of 'Fraudulent Election' Are All Likely to Be Argued

■ Host: Kim Sun-young Anchor
■ Appearance: Kim Jin, former Editorial Writer at JoongAng Ilbo, Choi Chang-ryul, Special Professor at Yongin University

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News Special] when quoting.

◇Anchor> Anyway, what is the logic of Yoon Suk Yeol Yoon Seok-yeol's response to the current Constitutional Court hearing? It will be revealed slowly now, but in the case of yesterday, this was mentioned. When I showed you the graphic again a while ago, Bae Jin-jin's lawyer brought up the fraudulent election again. I said that I think fraudulent elections are very related to China.

◆Choi Chang-ryul> I think this is a story without fail. Look, the Constitutional Court has a reason for impeachment. The unconstitutionality and illegality of declaring martial law. And the unconstitutionality of Proclamation No. 1. And there is obstruction of parliamentary activities. It's on the decree. And the seizure and search of the NEC, these are the four reasons for impeachment. However, we just talked about the election fraud, but the Constitutional Court does not judge whether it is an election fraud or not. It's about how much these four things violate the Constitution and martial law, impeachment. Then, the declaration of martial law and the obstruction of parliamentary activities, which has recently been a problem, are that they will consider the criminal law, but they will not. This is a different story.Ma doesn't mean he's going to withdraw his rebellion. I'm going to consider the Constitution and martial law on these four things, but this lawyer is talking about fraudulent elections. This is not an issue in the eyes of the justices. Since this is not a criminal trial, it is the Constitutional Court's judgment to determine whether the violation of the Constitution and laws that can lead to the president's dismissal was serious. I'm sure you all know that.E. But all of a sudden, we're talking about a rigged election, and this has to be discussed elsewhere, even if it's argued. You can argue in the Constitutional Court. I can plead, but this is why martial law has been declared, but it does not fall under the four reasons for impeachment that I mentioned, rigged elections. It's a strategy that doesn't mean much.

◇ Anchor> There is no benefit in emphasizing it.

◆Choi Chang-ryul> I think it could be more negative.

◆Kim Jin> First of all, the unconstitutionality of the decree, the reason for the declaration of emergency martial law, and the blockade of the National Assembly have included fraudulent elections as one of the four major issues in the impeachment trial. One of the four reasons the Constitutional Court decided to include fraudulent elections is that one of the issues is fraudulent elections. And I think the Constitutional Court's decision this time will reveal a large part of the suspicion of fraudulent elections. This is because 90 clerks with some Chinese nationality, who claim from President Yoon's side at the Constitutional Court, received training at the Election Training Institute in the Republic of Korea. However, it is one of the main evidences of fraud conspiracy theorists that they were deeply involved in fraudulent elections. President Yoon's side is also pushing it, so the Constitutional Court is not avoiding it, but the Constitutional Court should consider it. Whether it's true or not. So I applied for a fact check with the NEC. Then it's been revealed this time what kind of people are 90 people and why they were trained at the election training center and whether or not they are involved in election fraud. It's good to take the next step. It will be of great help to our society if such an absurd claim of election fraud is found to be completely groundless in the Constitutional Court this time along with the impeachment decision.



Excerpted from the conversation: Lee Mi-young, editor of the digital news team

#YRecord