The prosecution said in the reason for appeal submitted to the Seoul High Court that there was a request to Lee in August 2021, after Kim Jin-sung, who was accused of being an accomplice of Lee, recommended A as an election campaign policy figure.
In addition, when Kim sent A's mobile number to Lee at the time, Lee replied, "Thank you," and claimed that if Kim had not perjured as Lee requested, he would not have been able to ask for personnel appointments directly.
The prosecution also presented several precedents that Lee was punished as a perjury teacher after sending documents containing his claims, including newspapers, to witnesses like Lee, and emphasized that Lee's actions were obvious to the perjury teacher.
Representative Lee was put on trial in 2018 on charges of false disclosure in connection with the so-called "prosecutor impersonation" case, and asked Kim to testify falsely.
In November last year, the first trial found CEO Lee not guilty, judging that he had no intention of perjury.
※ 'Your report becomes news'
[Kakao Talk] YTN Search and Add Channel
[Phone] 02-398-8585
[Mail] social@ytn.co.kr
[Copyright holder (c) YTN Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution and use of AI data prohibited]
Society
More- President Yoon Attends Impeachment Trial... "Confidence in Liberal Democracy"
- [Breaking News] Constitutional Court Ends Third Argument Date for President Yoon's Impeachment Trial
- Prosecutors indict Son Tae-seung without detention for 'unfair loans by relatives of Woori Bank'
- [Breaking News] President Yoon's lawyers proceed with President Yoon's newspaper.