"Daejang-dong Lawyer" Park Gyun-taek, "Kim 檢, Kim Gun-hee are not prosecuted? "Unusual"

- 檢 to write 'The Devil's Edit' indictment...Lee Jae-myung 'not guilty' is expected of course
- 'Kim Gun-hee not prosecuted' is unusual...尹 governance base = Prosecutor's Office, in fact, 'political hunting'
- 尹 governance base = Prosecutor's Office is practically conducting a 'political hunting'
- Kim 尹 and Han Dong-hoon seem to have differences in their characteristics. - Kim Dae-nam, you don't seem to talk about it without grounds.Proven by his attitude toward South Korea.

- 檢 to write 'The Devil's Edit' indictment...Lee Jae-myung 'not guilty' is expected of course
- 'Kim Gun-hee not prosecuted' is unusual...尹 governance base = Prosecutor's Office, in fact, 'political hunting'
- 尹 governance base = Prosecutor's Office is practically conducting a 'political hunting'
- Kim 尹 and Han Dong-hoon seem to have differences in their characteristics. - Kim Dae-nam, you don't seem to talk about it without grounds.Proving with an attitude toward South Korea

◆ [YTN Radio SHINYUL's news]
■ Broadcasting: FM 94.5 (17:00-19:00)
■ Air date: October 2, 2024 (Wednesday)
■ Proceedings: Shin Yul, Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy at Myongji University
■ Talk: ☎ Rep. Park Kyun-taek of the Democratic Party of Korea

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

◇ Shin Yul: YTN Radio's Shin Yul's News Head-to-head Match Part 4 begins. Park Kyun-taek of the Democratic Party of Korea will meet in the front interview of the fourth part today. I'm on the phone right now. Hello, Senator Park.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, hello. I'm Park Gyun-taek.

◇ Shin Yul: Yes. I have a lot of questions to ask. First, let me ask you this. You were Lee Jae-myung's lawyer anyway. In the past, anyway, the prosecution demanded three years in prison for perjury teachers and two years in prison for violating the Public Official Election Act last time, both of which are the maximum sentences. Out of the old ones?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right.

◇ Shin Yul: Yes. So, the lawmaker said that it's an old version that he's never heard of. But I'm curious about this. Now, CEO Lee Jae-myung has revealed the recorded file directly on social media while talking about evidence of squeezing, but if this is squeezing, are you saying that only the squeezing was disclosed during the trial? Or did the entire court hear the entire transcript? How was it?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right. So, when the prosecution filed an arrest warrant in the past, this time, when it filed a prosecution, didn't the prosecution write a story that was unfavorable to a certain representative, Lee Jae-myung, and put together something that seemed a little strange? This means that they excluded all of them and wrote an indictment that was edited by some devil, and anyway, the court heard the entire transcript once at the end, so we expect to make a reasonable ruling in conclusion.

◇ Sin-ryul: Is this a reasonable verdict now on November 15th? That's when the acquittal will come out. That's what you're talking about, right?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes. Of course, I expect to be innocent.

◇ Sin Yul: I see. Anyway, I think CEO Lee Jae-myung is quite angry. It is a crime that distorted the law and a pro-Japanese coup. Regarding the prosecution, this is what I'm talking about. In the end, the prosecution dismissed the prosecution's indictment of Mrs. Kim Gun-hee and Pastor Choi Jae-young today. How do you rate it?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: Actually, couldn't Pastor Choi Jae-young have been prosecuted? He asked the prosecution to indict him because it was deep in the prosecution, and Pastor Choi Jae-young asked the prosecution to indict him, but the prosecution couldn't indict him. If you think about the reason, prosecuting Pastor Choi Jae-young could be an expression of job relevance, which could lead to loss to First Lady Kim Gun-hee, or be called as a witness in Pastor Choi Jae-young's case, so in the end, Pastor Choi Jae-young inevitably looked at her to protect First Lady Kim Gun-hee.

◇ Sin-ryul: In general, the prosecution more often accepted it as suggested by the investigation review committee.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I remember doing it almost the same.

◇ Sin-ryul: It's pretty much the same, but this case is exceptional, right?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right. And you couldn't prosecute me even though the person in charge even told you to prosecute me because you'd rather go to court to reveal the truth, right? It's a very unusual phenomenon.

◇ Sin Rhyul: It is an unusual phenomenon. I see. So if you don't prosecute it now, this is all over. What's wrong with the principle of double jeopardy?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: It's over for now, but the problem is that this is not a substrate, so if someone accuses it and takes issue with it again in the future, it may be reversed by another investigative agency and by the prosecution, which has a proper investigation team later on.

◇ Shin Yul: Yes. If you said it was right, you're saying it wasn't right now, right?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right. It may be some problem of Yoon himself when he is mistrusting the public and has this low approval rating, but isn't it also the problem of Kim Gun-hee and the prosecution that underlies his administration? I don't think anyone would rate it as normal.

◇ Sin-ryul: Do you think the foundation of Yoon Suk Yeol's governance is the prosecution?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right. So, if soldiers with guns and swords were used as a means of governing the world during the past military regime, now that some rule of law has been completed to some extent, the prosecution is the only organization that has legal power, so the prosecution will use it to control the opposition party. Looking at it now, I think it is almost legal in appearance but is actually engaged in a political hunting game. So in terms of content, I have no choice but to think that it is illegal and unfair.

◇ Shin Yul: Now CEO Han Dong-hoon is also a prosecutor, right? However, President Yoon Suk Yeol passes representative Han Dong-hoon. How do you watch it when you're talking about this? Do you agree?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, I think that's right. I think it's the difference between your personalities, but President Yoon Suk Yeol always thinks that it's the right way to be a human being to show loyalty with a close relationship and personal loyalty, and our representative Han Dong-hoon is the type to pursue his or her path in a cool manner without considering any personal affection when he needs something. This is a personality problem that causes inconvenience to President Yoon, and I think President Yoon is openly showing his attitude of not even joining him for a meal in order to reject Han Dong-hoon.

◇ Shin Yul: Did you see the recording of Kim Dae-nam's phone call with the reporter on the sound of Seoul?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right.

◇ Shin Yul: But since Rep. Park Gyun-taek was a prosecutor, I will ask you a question. What did you think about the power of the people when you heard the transcript of the call?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I don't think I said anything unfounded. Kim Gun-hee hates CEO Han Dong-hoon, so I think she would like it if she attacked him. I don't think a person named Kim Dae-nam has to say such things from manipulation to manipulation. That's why I said what happened, and I think that's an example of Yongsan's heart toward CEO Han Dong-hoon in Yongsan.

◇ Shin Yul: Is this legally defamatory and obstructing work on the power side of the people now? There are reports that they want to sue with it, do you think it's possible?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: How can you prove that Kim Gun-hee read the psychology over there and said that she must have that kind of heart, and she expressed it because she knows how she feels, but how can you prove that she doesn't? It is an impossible problem to prove itself, and the other thing is that President Yoon's behavior toward representative Han Dong-hoon now proves that what Kim Dae-nam said is true. So punishment will be impossible.

◇ Sin-ryul: Punishment is impossible. So the prosecution will not prosecute again. Are you talking about this?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: In the end, I don't want to indict you, so I won't deal with it because I'm angry with the president and I'll quit for about three years.

◇ Shin Yul: Yes. And our lawmaker Park Gyun-taek, is your constituency in Honam? Rep. Park Kyun-taek, who is in the by-elections, has a constituency in Honam, but he is in the by-elections. Glory and wailing, how do you see the situation?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: How do you say prediction of results?

◇ Sin-ryul: It's working well now rather than predicting the outcome. How do you see it?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I think there is a healthy competition. However, I now have a lawyer and a lawmaker's office there at Yeonggwangtong Intersection near the entrance to Yeonggwang, and the district is right next to it. So, I understand the hearts of Yeonggwang County residents well to some extent, but I think there is a good feeling for the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, but in the end, the affection, trust, and expectation for the Democratic Party of Korea are so big that there is no big problem because it is a fight between the same democratic camp, but I understand that the basic affection for the Democratic Party remains unchanged.

◇ Shin Yul: Isn't it sure that Rep. Park Kyun-taek actually supported there?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I understand that there are still a few cases where the leadership of the party is mainly leaving, and I'm going to leave a little late, but people around me call their acquaintances in Yeonggwang and promote them.

◇ Shin Yul: I heard CEO Lee Jae-myung is going to the honor tomorrow.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes. I don't know because what I'm going to do and what the party leadership is going to do is different.

◇ Shin Yul: Rep. Park Kyun-taek is so humble again.

☆ Park Kyun-taek: But I'm planning to go with our party officials next week to explain why they need to support the Democratic candidate a little bit, and now I'm only doing phone activities.

◇ Shin Yul: But as Representative Park Kyun-taek said, I don't know who sees it objectively, but it's not easy for the two parties to fight.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, that's right. It's an area that's been supported by the Democratic Party of Korea, but as the new party tries to build a nest there again, not only the election parties but also those around them will feel a sense of competition and the need to do their best. However, regardless of the result, it would not be desirable to make excessive stimulation with this or say something that goes against manners.

◇ Shin-yul: Then, from the perspective of Representative Park Kyun-taek, it is not a general election, but after the by-elections, the two parties can work together smoothly again.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: There could be some unpleasant things for a while. After all, the reason why we are united with each other now is that the Yoon Suk Yeol government is so self-righteous that we agree politically and cooperate with each other in the process of checking, judging, or coming up with some legislative alternative. So, I think such a situation will develop where there is no problem at all in cooperating in a large framework.

◇ Shin Yul: You just talked about the Yoon Suk Yeol government, are you Kang Deuk-gu? Wasn't it a little controversial now that he rented the event called Impeachment Night at the National Assembly Hall? How do you view this part, Rep. Park Kyun-taek?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: I think the party expressed that it may be a little different from the party's position, but I have no intention of criticizing that at all. The reason is that the discussion is a constitutional method, and it is not impossible to discuss it in a country where we have freedom of expression and political freedom, is it? If so, I don't think I did anything wrong with this because it can be done in the National Assembly, which should be the center of politics, and it's just lent space.

◇ Shin-yul: Rep. Kang Deuk-gu can do it again now. If you do the same thing, but I don't really know. Some say that the reason for impeachment is not a reason given the suspicions and problems raised so far. What do you think?

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I think there's a reason. However, there are questions about whether the people will approve of it for reasons only now and whether lawmakers will vote for it, but I think there may be enough reasons for impeachment because of things that have been revealed so far.

◇ Sin-ryul: For example, what are they?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: Isn't there a case of First Lady Kim Gun-hee? And there are cases of Chae Hae-byeong, and politically, aren't there many things that are distrusted by some people? So, when political evaluation and some legal errors are combined, I don't think it's a problem that the discussion of impeachment takes place. Rather, I don't want to say why they are discussing impeachment, but I want to try to create an atmosphere where people who talk about impeachment are criticized by the public. We will do what we want, but regardless of whether we have distrust from the public or low approval ratings, we will do what we want and we will not try to restore people's livelihoods, but they should not talk about impeachment. It doesn't seem to fit the public sentiment to say that they should not talk about impeachment. So, I'm hoping that the government and the ruling party will make a lot of efforts to win public trust so that the talk of impeachment can't be talked about and that it won't succeed.

◇ Shin Yul: Some argue that the Democratic Party of Korea is talking about shortening the early term of the impeachment constitution in relation to the judicial risk of representative Lee Jae-myung. What do you think?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: I think that's what lawmakers and government officials are saying now, but if the current party leader was someone other than Lee Jae-myung,If there had not been a trial case, wouldn't there be a chance that he would have clapped for cutting this political situation as normal? The opposition party has no choice but to run because the ruling party is not doing it to restore people's livelihoods, and the Democratic Party of Korea must have made efforts to correct its behavior of illegally preventing such investigations, political hunting against the ruling and opposition parties, and protecting the ruling party against the opposition party. I don't think this will have changed depending on who the representative is.

◇ Shin Yul: So even if it wasn't representative Lee Jae-myung, he would have acted the same even if there were other representatives. You can understand it like this.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: That's right. Looking at the politics now, hasn't it been developed in the past that the ruling party was originally working, the government was working, and the opposition party was cooperating or holding back? But now, the government and the ruling party are not doing anything, so there is no need to hold back. Rather, if the opposition party passes the bill to revive people's livelihoods, the ruling party or the president's office will veto it, so how can we evaluate the current situation as normal? This doesn't seem to be a question of who the party leader is. I think the issue is whether the government and the ruling party are doing it properly or not.

◇ Shin Yul: If I ask one more thing about representative Lee Jae-myung, he said that supporters of representative Lee Jae-myung are campaigning to submit a petition for innocence. But since you used to be a legal professional, does this actually work?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: I don't think that it affects the presiding judge as much or that it seems logical. However, I think it is just an expression of the frustration of the supporters, so there is no reason to stop it, but I don't think it will be reflected in the trial. But if it's frustrating, if it's hard, would you try to launch such a petition movement? I think we should try to understand the public sentiment that is trying to add strength to the difficult feelings and think that they are being investigated by some target.

◇ Shin Yul: One more question, how much influence do you think the hardcore supporters have on the Democratic Party?

☆ Park Kyun-taek: But when we talk about rigid supporters last time, don't you think people who actively support Lee Jae-myung are called rigid supporters these days? But what percentage of the party's leadership election last time did not support Lee Jae-myung? As a result, it seems that we have no choice but to evaluate it as the universal mind of the party members, not to describe it as a strong party member. If only 20 to 30 percent of them supported and they led the atmosphere, the strong party members would have expressed that they would influence the atmosphere of the party, but if 85 percent feel the same way, I think it should be evaluated as the universal mind of the party members, not the strong party members.

◇ Sin-ryul: One last thing. The Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor's Law, the Coporal Chae Special Prosecutor's Law, and others seem to be all requests for re-denial, so they are going to exercise their veto power, what do you think? Do you think there can be a breakaway vote or something? Please give me a brief explanation.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: I think it's coming out. First of all, there is a lot of skepticism about the Yoon administration within the ruling party about the National Assembly, and there are opinions that it should be removed now because of Kim's judicial risk and intervention in the nomination. Also, isn't President Yoon showing such a narrow-minded attitude that he even rejected Han Dong-hoon at the dinner table? So I think about eight votes of departure will be enough. And last week, there was no departure vote on the Yellow Envelope Act broadcasting law, but isn't Kim Gun-hee's corruption a matter of personal corruption that has nothing to do with the party's identity? This is not a matter of progressive conservatives, so of course, there will be a lot of votes in favor.

◇ Shin Yul: Okay. Thank you for your words today. Thank you.

☆ Park Gyun-taek: Yes, thank you.

◇ Shin Yul: I was Park Kyun-taek of the Democratic Party of Korea.