Jang Ye-chan, " 152 slanderous messages on the party's bulletin board under the name of Han Dong-hoon's daughter."

- Seo Bum-soo, you don't have a party audit? It's not about a secretary general being elected.It's like bean powder.

[News FM Lee Ik-seon Choi Soo-young Issue & People]

□ Broadcast date and time: November 15, 2024 (Fri)
□ Host: Lee Ik-seon, Choi Soo-young
□ Performers: Kim Sung-wan, current affairs critic, Jang Ye-chan, the supreme council member for the power of the whole nation

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

◇ Profit Line: Okay. This week's top 3 third keyword. The third keyword is the party member bulletin board.

◆Choi Soo-young: Party bulletin boards have emerged as a hot issue in the power of the people these days. In fact, at the general meeting of the lawmakers yesterday, we decided to applaud the recommendation of the special inspection team as a party theory, so the atmosphere was very friendly. Also, President Yoon's Gallup's approval rating today seems to have recovered to the 20% level in three weeks, making a single voice, but it seems to be on fire due to the controversy over the party's bulletin board.

□Kim Sung-wan: That's the part I'm most curious about. Rather, I want to ask the best of Jang. Please talk a lot here.

■Jang Ye-chan: Just a short explanation. There were a lot of rude talk about the president left by a party member named Han Dong-hoon. However, CEO Han Dong-hoon explained that it was not him. The truth can be determined by the investigative agency. But by chance, all the party members with the same family name as representative Han Dong-hoon were found. The father-in-law, mother, and daughter. But even for this, CEO Han Dong-hoon can say, "I found out that it's not my family," but he can't say that. The official position hasn't come out yet, with suspicions continuing to be raised. The official position is that there is no reason to confirm the family. And yesterday, reporters asked CEO Han Dong-hoon, who came out of the medical meeting, if he had checked with his family, and he said, "Thank you." So I told you that it's not frustrating. So is it hard to ask your family if they did this? You can just say no. However, if one member of the family denies systematically posting articles or columns criticizing President Yoon Suk Yeol and First Lady Kim Gun-hee on the bulletin board in the name of another family member, it could be a weakness if the investigation is conducted with false information. But if a forced investigation goes into this. I need to submit a server to the party. You can also be raided. Then, all confidential data of the party and the personal information of 800,000 party members will be handed over to the police because of suspicions about representative Han Dong-hoon's family. So, there are quite a few lawmakers who want to do a party audit to prevent it in advance, and since there have been heated discussions at the parliamentary meeting, this will probably be an important topic at next week's Supreme Council.

◇Lee Ik-seon: No, but Party Secretary-General Seo Bum-soo drew the line saying it was not a matter of party audit.

■Jang Ye-chan: One Secretary-General does not have the right to vote. I've been a member of the Supreme Council. The party's highest voting body in the party hierarchy is the highest. The Secretary-General is lower than the Supreme Council members. It's under the chairman of the policy committee. There is a clear rank, but since the secretary-general does something and audits the party's affairs, the party's discipline has almost become bean powder.

◆Choi Soo-young: So at yesterday's general meeting, floor leader Choo Kyung-ho said that we should talk about this later because we need to discuss special inspector or something. Do you think this issue will once again be a catalyst for the internal conflict of the people's power?

□Kim Sung-wan: Similar things happened in the Democratic Party of Korea in the past. If we continue to explain that part quickly and turn off the lights, like representative Han Dong-hoon or the leadership of the People's Power, we cannot check all personal information and there is no way to respond, then there will be a continuous attack or suspicion. Moreover, since suspicions have been raised that it is related to CEO Han Dong-hoon's family, if CEO Han Dong-hoon does not actively finish it quickly, he is likely to go like a very messy fight if he does not explain and explain it. And haven't the police started investigating anyway? But the Democratic Party of Korea is good at seizure and search. I also think that it is this difficult to search and confiscate the power of the people.

■Jang Yechan: It's impossible. So, even if you don't want to do that, you should preemptively audit your party and submit related data to the prosecution first.

◇Lee Ik-seon: However, Supreme Council member Jang named it 'Han Dong-hoon's family version of Druking'. Jang's best person, please explain why you came up with this.

■Jang Ye-chan: So, as I said for the first time, CEO Han Dong-hoon's spouse, mother-in-law, and mother-in-law's daughter...

◇Lee Ik-seon: But even if it's a family member, can't you write on the bulletin board?

■Jang Ye-chan: Then you can confidently say that my family wrote it. However, most of the contents of the article generally criticize and criticize President Yoon Suk Yeol, First Lady Kim Gun-hee, and fellow politicians. They only bring such newspaper columns, so they criticize and swear at the president. Originally, it was not possible to search by real name, but if you search by name, you will get a real name. So, the real name was specified, and according to common sense, it is unlikely that all the names of all five family members are the same name, and sometimes they post every five minutes. And the content of the article is the same without changing a single Toshi. What is this? Actually, there's no way that in-laws can sit together and post it together on that night. It can only be interpreted that one of the family members or an outside comment team manager posted this post after receiving the family name. In addition, if you look at the monthly Chosun articles, the article states that Han Dong-hoon's spouse, lawyer Jin Eun-jung, is very good at online community activities such as mom cafe activities. So yesterday, I'm appealing to the prosecution, saying, "Lawyer Jin Eun-jung is the body" or, "Successfully, sue me." However, if I raise anything from the power of the people, such as CEO Han Dong-hoon or Chairman Joo Jin-woo of the Legal Advisory Committee, I can't do the chirping, as I did in the previous convention. Because I only talk about evidence. I'll stop here. In addition, so far, only four father-in-law, mother-in-law, and mother-in-law have been mentioned, but it was recently reported, and 152 posts have been posted in the name of Lee Han-Ooo for two months. 152 in two months means I worked really hard on it. For two months, almost two or three months. But again, the time I posted this is with the other four in front of me every 5 minutes. So, with this added, I think additional truth-finding measures will probably be included.

□Kim Sung-wan: By the way, is it a problem for families to make a group chat and leave comments for our son, son-in-law and father?

■Jang Ye-chan: For example, if the family members of First Lady Kim Gun-hee posted a message criticizing Han Dong-hoon on the People's Power Bulletin Board, wouldn't it have been overturned if it had been discovered and caused such a stir? Some people who ask what's wrong with it say that when you're in reverse, but if there's no problem, you should admit it or say no.

◇Lee Ik-seon: But yesterday, we talked about lawyer Kang Jeon-ae, lawyer Jang Yoon-mi, and this is just freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and now we are in a mood of reconciliation. Why do we need to do this?

■Jang Ye-chan: The mood of reconciliation happened to be created after the suspicion of this party's bulletin board broke out. I don't believe that any one team or the party has an intention. I think he's been saving his body since then because he has a weak point. That's how I see it.

□Kim Sung-wan: CEO Han Dong-hoon needs to explain clearly. Or say no, and if this is anyone's external political suspicions or offensives, you can say yes. I think that not being able to say that right now is actually motivating a lot of people. If something similar happened in the Democratic Party of Korea, what would representative Han Dong-hoon attack? I think he would have said something. In my view, CEO Han Dong-hoon should know that. In fact, some former prosecutors or lawyers fall into such errors. What's wrong with the law? You say it like this. The realm of politics is different from that. Defending motivation well is one of the party's leadership's abilities. I really want to tell you this.

◇Lee Ik-seon: Thank you for this week's top three. Kim Sung-wan, a current affairs critic, and Jang Ye-chan, a member of the Supreme Council for the Power of the People. Thank you.