與 Controversy Over Party Bulletin, "Macro, No Obstruction of Business, Party Law Violates"

◆ [YTN Radio SHINYUL's news]
■ Broadcasting: FM 94.5 (17:00-19:00)
■ Air date: November 21, 2024 (Thursday)
■ Proceedings: Shin Yul, Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy at Myongji University
■ Lawyer Yoon Ki-chan, Lawyer Seol Ju-wan

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

Yoongi-chan
- Isn't it a violation of the party law on the bulletin board within the 與..The Secretary-General needs to move and resolve it within the party
- The power of the people is now concerned about the possibility of theft.System maintenance required

Seol Ju-wan
- It seems that there is enough possibility of violating the party law when the 與 party uses the bulletin board illegally, so
- Macro, it does not correspond to business interference..In the case of defamation, it is necessary to confirm the intention to punish

◆ Sin-ryul: The power of the people. There's a lot of trouble with the anonymous bulletin board, but what I want to ask lawyer Yoon is that this is legally illegal. Can't you blame the president? How do you see it?

■ Yoongi-chan: So if you talk about various false facts for the purpose of slander against the president, there is a requirement for our arrest. defamation of the Information and Communication Network Act

◆ Shin Yul: But what happens if you think about yourself, not a false fact?

■ Yoongi-chan: There are a lot of things. There are many things, and I think it is an issue that needs to be resolved within the party, whether it should go to investigation. The first is that the secretary-general does not need to conduct a party audit, and I think it is necessary for the secretary-general to investigate the facts and then report them to the leadership, including the Supreme Council, in private, and then conclude it within the party. I don't know if the secretary-general is still investigating or not, but since he's not doing it, some people keep saying, "Thank you for your party." And Jang Ye-chan, the former best, is talking outside the party. So, I personally think the secretary-general should move quickly because of the misunderstanding of whether the party is going to a conflict or hiding it on purpose from the perspective of CEO Han Dong-hoon.

◆ Shin Yul: But I have a question: Under the party law, detailed information of party members is not allowed to be disclosed. Yes, of course. But is it okay to do a party audit and search and watch it among themselves?

◇ Seol Ju-wan: So the part that already points out about that is that there are 7 or 8 people with the same name as CEO Han Dong-hoon. Then, didn't you already check their personal information to find people other than Han Dong-hoon, who was born in '73? But why can't you check this about other people who say they have family relationships with Han Dong-hoon? This criticism is

◆ Sin Yul: It could be the same name.

◇ Seol Ju-wan: So, one side of the argument is saying that Jang Ye-chan, the former supreme leader, is not talking about it, but Han Dong-hoon is saying that he can't understand why he's saying that he can't check the rest of the people after he's all the same name, but I can't understand why he's saying it's a political hit. Personally, if you look at this, it's

◆ Shin Yul: So, for example, if you find a person with the same name and judge that it's a person or not, is that a violation of the party law? Isn't it?

◇ Seol Ju-wan: I'm not sure. It seems to be a violation of the party law, and it is so justified to do it through a party prosecutor

■ Yoongi-chan: That's not a violation of the party law. Because it's not leaking to anyone, because there's only one sugar within the party. There are only several organizations in it, so it is not a violation of the party law to confirm the facts based on the information held within the party, and I think it is enough to do so. I think the best solution is to tell the leadership that this is what happened, so that it doesn't leak out of the box.
◆ Sin-ryul: It's a violation if it's new. If it is distributed outside, for example, if it is leaked outside, as a result of us in the party, if it becomes like this, it will be caught by anyone, someone, someone, someone, and someone who has been a few years old. This?

◇ Seol Ju-wan: It doesn't matter as long as it's not specific, so for example, it doesn't matter if it's information enough to identify the same person, but if the purpose itself is intended for illegal use, for example, it's considered to be sufficient to violate the party law

■ Yoongi-chan: But on the other hand, from the perspective of the misunderstood person, if you get confirmation that this is not the case, that's going to solve the misunderstanding. So, personally, the most worrisome thing about the power of the people is that it has been stolen. Someone's ID is because you need to get a mobile phone authentication to get an ID so that you can write. But if the cell phone number is also a different number, if it's not the person indicated there and the cell phone you have, it's stolen. So, keeping that possibility in mind, if that happens, the bulletin board itself will actually be written by someone other than me, so the system needs to be overhauled. From that point of view, the Secretary-General is obliged to cooperate with the Public Relations Bureau to report to the leadership in the investigation as soon as possible what was wrong with this part.

◆ Shin Yul: But macros are actually good when we had macros in the Druking case. It's a macro that keeps clicking on things like this, and there's another macro. So, for example, when we use a word process or something, there's a macro function, and that macro function wouldn't be a violation. Since I wrote something on the bulletin board, this is a bit...

◇ Seol Ju-wan: I don't think that can interfere with business. Next, I see that there are many criticisms, such as articles or posts critical of the president and his wife, and editorials. There were also disparaging expressions. However, if a disparaging expression is intended to be a crime of defamation or insult, the crime of insult is a crime of parental complaint, so there must be a complaint from a victim. In the case of defamation, a third party can file a complaint because it is an anti-intentional punishment, but there are parts where I need to check whether I have any intention of punishment or not, so I think

◆ Sin Yul: But the important thing is that time is up. If you tell me what's definitely important next week, it's really important, but we'll stop here today's two of you taking a break. Thank you.

◇ Seol Ju-wan, ■ Yoongi-chan: Yes, thank you.

◆ Shin Yul: We've been with two lawyers, Yoon Ki-chan and Seol Ju-wan.