Shin Dong-wook "Jang Ye-chan claims outside the party to investigate obstruction of business...It's not a pre-emptive decision.

◆ [YTN Radio SHINYUL's news]
■ Broadcasting: FM 94.5 (17:00-19:00)
■ Air date: November 27, 2024 (Wednesday)
■ Proceedings: Shin Yul, Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy at Myongji University
■ Dialogue: Shin Dong-wook, member of the People's Power,

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

- 與 The search and seizure of the company is embarrassing and distraught.Cooperation to clarify suspicions of 'nomination intervention'
- Party bulletin board clash? There's an exaggerated aspect of it.Isn't it in a conflict structure?
- Jang Ye-chan claims outside the party to investigate obstruction of business.Isn't it a preemptive judgment situation?
- Presidential attack in the name of the party leader's family...I have no choice but to take it sensitively.
- Mentioning 'Auntie Kim' in a close relationship? Making it difficult for the party leader to enter...It's hard to deal with it.
- The Democratic Party of Korea attacks by changing the date of the special prosecution law.Political and political
- no 與 vote...The independent counsel law and the party bulletin board issue are completely separate
- The Democratic Party of Korea floating the "Han Dong-hoon Special Counsel Act"? "Lee Jae-myung's Special Counsel Act." We need to add 10 more times.
◆Shinryul: YTN Radio's Shinryul News Scene Match In today's front-facing interview for the fourth part. We will have time to connect with Shin Dong-wook, the spokesman for the People's Power, and listen to his position on the current issue. Hello, Representative Shin.

◇Shin Dong-wook: Yes, hello.

◆ Shin Yul: The prosecution raided the People's Power Party over there today.

◇ Shin Dong-wook: We're also embarrassed and confused right now.

◆ Shin-ryul: But as far as I remember, this is the search and seizure of the ruling party, the Democratic Party, during the past Moon Jae In administration. There was a search and seizure of the local headquarters of the Democratic Party, but this is the first search and seizure of the central headquarters of the ruling party like now. Rep. Shin, you've been a reporter for a long time, and you're a journalist, so you think the investigation has been conducted to some extent?

◇ Shin Dong-wook: As you know well, isn't this to reveal that Myung Tae-kyun had some influence in our party's nomination process by intervening in our party's nomination or in relation to the president? The Changwon District Prosecutors' Office is investigating hard, but there are not many things that have been raised through the media. In particular, the suspicious level of stories about former lawmaker Kim Young-sun has been reported indiscriminately through the media, so we have no choice but to check whether there was actual nomination intervention or not through the documents held by our party. And I think the prosecution probably has all the things that have been said through Myung Tae-kyun's mouth, but we have already said that those who were involved in the nomination at the time do not have such a thing as to how much it actually affected our party. So, as I said, our party intends to fully cooperate with the prosecution's investigation and present if there is anything necessary so that such suspicions are fully explained to the people.

◆ Shin-ryul: I have no choice but to ask you about the issue of the bulletin board of the party members recently, what do you think? I heard that the Supreme Council also clashed with this, what do you think?

◇Shin Dong-wook: I don't know. There is certainly an aspect in which the situation of the collision was conveyed too exaggeratedly through the media. So, we usually use the expressions "factional conflict," but the media seems to see the internal situation of our party as a conflict between pro-Yoon and pro-Korea, and writing articles like that makes it easier to write articles, so I think they see all the events that happened in our party as a conflict structure. For example, is it yesterday if someone just eats with whom? Chief of Staff Jeong Jin-seok said, "There were many close lawmakers and all of them, and these are also interpreted as conflict structures, so we are quite embarrassed about those parts. In the meantime, there are some people who see this part in the conflict structure because there is a problem with the bulletin board, but it is certainly true that this is a very sensitive issue, not in a very conflicting structure as you can see from the outside. That is why all of our Members, especially Members, who look at this are different. So, at the Supreme Council meeting the day before yesterday, former Supreme Council member Kim Min openly raised the issue, and in the process, our party's secretary general stepped in and made a public statement. In a closed meeting after the public meeting, I call the Supreme Council a meeting with people who can speak. He pointed out that if the participants intervene in the remarks of the Supreme Council members and talk freely, the meeting cannot proceed, so this is wrong. In the process, there was a controversy over whether the Supreme Council member attacked the party leader, but that part where my name was mentioned is not important or a big part. It has become an important situation how our party will resolve or end the issue of the bulletin board without developing it into a larger conflict structure.

◆ Shin Yul: The lawmaker said it was a sensitive issue, so which part do you think is the most sensitive?

◇Shin Dong-wook: Anyway, there may be lawmakers' thoughts on whether these parts are appropriate or not because of the messages such as attacking the president in the name of the party leader's family, and on the other hand, some argue that what's wrong with expressing one's opinion on the anonymous bulletin board of the party, whether it is the president or the leader of the party. However, from either side, this is a situation where this part is inevitably sensitive.

◆ Shin Yul: But it's not a question of whether it's illegal or not.

◇ Shin Dong-wook: Even if it becomes a legal issue later, it seems that the party has no choice but to view it as a political issue and a case of greater political significance.

◆ Shin Yul: Anyway, is it the law of the power of the people? It seems that they conducted a full investigation on posts under the name of Han and his family, but there seems to be another fairness issue, right?

◇Shin Dong-wook: The chairman of the legal advisory committee is Representative Joo Jin-woo, and the legal advisory committee recently announced that after conducting a full investigation on the related articles, they analyzed how problematic they are. However, there is some controversy over whether this is an objective or subjective analysis, but I personally have to admit that if our party's official organization investigated it like that. As I said earlier, there seem to be many very sensitive reactions within the party over this issue, and I think we should respect what the party's official organization has done anyway.

◆ Shin Yul: But the Dong-A Ilbo must have reported like this again. A comment on the portal news was posted on the party's bulletin board under the name of Han Dong-hoon's spouse. He seems to be making this argument, so the obstruction of business on the portal should also be investigated. Former Supreme Council member Jang Ye-chan, I think he's the one who's talking like this. What do you think?

◇Shin Dong-wook: I don't know. As you said, I've seen the Dong-A Ilbo report, and at this stage, I can't judge what serious it is to the point that it should be viewed as obstruction of business. The article itself seems to have been verified and written by the media, but it is still difficult for us to confirm what level of comments these are, so what former Supreme Council member Jang Ye-chan claims is an argument from outside our party, so we accept it as it is, but I don't think it's a situation where we preemptively judge what kind of business interference there was on the portal.

◆ Shin-ryul: Major high-ranking officials in the pro-Korean community are now talking about the mention of First Lady Kim Gun-hee. How do you see this?

◇Shin Dong-wook: As I said a while ago, we have no choice but to deal with this issue by focusing on the leader of our party, but I personally worry that if we continue to take this as a momentum, there will be a long way to go to deal with it. Rather than dealing with this problem by developing it into a big problem, we will organize it well with internal problems of our party bulletin board and manage it so that it does not lead to a bigger internal conflict or conflict, and in this process, everyone and the people are very worried right now, right? If there is anything to apologize for, we should apologize and end it well, but I wonder if it will be difficult to solve the problem if we continue to criticize and slander each other, and if we take the problem in this way, who did better, CEO Han Dong-hoon's position at the center of this controversy continues to be difficult, but it is difficult to understand why he does so.

◆ Shin Yul: Hasn't Kim Kun-hee passed the independent counsel law again? To the National Assembly. But I think it's a little later than originally planned. Is it December 10th?

◇Shin Dong-wook: Originally, it was supposed to be processed at the plenary session tomorrow Thursday, but yesterday, the Democratic Party suddenly delayed the date to December 10. Since the current situation in our party is that the Democratic Party of Korea unilaterally decides the schedule of the National Assembly and does what they want, we have no choice but to prepare ourselves accordingly, but isn't the Democratic Party too political and political? These have already been rejected several times, and the Democratic Party is in a real hurry to see it come out like this again. Of course, representative Lee Jae-myung's ruling was found not guilty in the first trial, so the Democratic Party of Korea is said to have improved its mood now, but how many issues of representative Lee Jae-myung still remain? In the future, we are in a situation where we are being tried and sentenced again, and the Democratic Party of Korea should consider those things carefully and weigh itself. It is very unfortunate that they persistently attack us over the issue of the Special Prosecutor's Act of Kim Gun-hee and use all kinds of political calculations by changing the date.

◆ Shin Yul: But the fact that we moved the date itself. Considering the internal divisions of the people's power, if we do that a little more, we'll get a lot of votes. There was also a theory that it was done with that calculation.

◇Shin Dong-wook: We're just guessing, but I think it's about two things. Since the acquittal of representative Lee Jae-myung came out, I wonder if he would have delayed the time to prevent the issue from being covered in order to further inform the public. Second, as our anchor said a little while ago, it seems clear that it is difficult to pass the vote if it is voted on now. So I think you're expecting that if you delay about two weeks, there will be lawmakers who will leave because of some internal problems in our party, but I think this and that are completely separate. Although the Democratic Party of Korea continues to push for the issue of the Special Prosecutor's Act, we don't think it's really based on a high degree of political calculation to do this continuously and repeatedly to us, which contains all kinds of unconstitutional provisions that are hard to understand why this should go to the Special Prosecutor's Office. And we're thinking that the departure ticket won't come out even if it's two weeks later.

◆ Shin-ryul: So this is a fact that all political parties have factions, so it's natural in some ways that there are factions in democratic parties, just as there are factions in the United Kingdom, for example, in the Labour Party or the Conservative Party. Of course, it's going to be in conflict. The conflict will have no effect on any Kim Gun-hee vote on the independent counsel law. You're looking at it like this, right?

◇Shin Dong-wook: That's what I think.

◆ Shin Yul: And one more thing is that Chairman Lee Jae-myung is strengthening his people's livelihood by talking about muksanism, and some say that the power of the people and people's livelihood are good, or that the presidential office should demand some kind of personnel reform sooner to show a movement to change something. What do you think?

◇Shin Dong-wook: Before I answer your question, isn't it just a slogan that Lee Jae-myung's muksanism? It's the Democratic Party that is really leading the National Assembly right now. If the Democratic Party really wants to do muksanism, it has to work hard on the bills for people's livelihoods. But as you all know, political bills, law distortion, prosecutor impeachment, etc. have already wasted six months. How can the Democratic Party talk about muksanism? Of course, we also have a lot to reflect on. However, after CEO Han Dong-hoon took office, we also formed a committee to resolve the gap, and the day before yesterday, a committee was formed in which a representative for the people's livelihood economy became the chairman. In this regard, our consistent position is that we should continue to deal with the bills for our people's livelihoods of the Democratic Party and then fight even if we fight. However, as I said a while ago, we don't have time to discuss people's livelihoods because we continue to push us with special prosecution laws and such. And what's going on in the standing committee? I really want the people to know these parts because they control all the number of standing committees they want and unilaterally pass all the bills needed for representative Lee Jae-myung's bulletproof. The current situation in the National Assembly has no reason or justification for the Democratic Party to claim muksanism. I really don't think the Democrats deserve that. We're trying to work hard, too. However, there are other problematic parts blocked by this, and as you said just a moment ago, the Special Prosecutor's Office Act on Mrs. Kim Gun-hee continues to pass? Not long ago, there were several such pains with the Special Prosecutor Act on the Dead Sea Disease, and in this process, our party should prevent any departure votes. In that sense, we are in a situation where we have to constantly pay attention to things like how many close we are and how many pro-Yoon-gye we are, so if the Democratic Party of Korea really returns to the people's livelihood instead of creating such a situation, we have the attitude to renovate, reflect, and consult with the Democratic Party of Korea to take good care of the people's livelihood. Of course, even if the Democratic Party does that, we will not stop constantly reflecting, reforming, and innovating in the future.

◆ Shin Yul: Speaking of the independent counsel law, the Democratic Party of Korea seems to be raising the independent counsel law Han Dong-hoon to the surface again, what do you think? I think this was originally said by the Innovation Party.

◇Shin Dong-wook: Before I asked for the independent counsel law, Han Dong-hoon. If this is the independent counsel law, Lee Jae-myung's independent counsel law must be done 10 times more. As you all know, representative Lee Jae-myung is currently on four trials and 11 charges are now applied. In addition, a few days ago, when he was governor of Gyeonggi-do Province, the corporate credit card issue is being investigated, and the Democratic Party of Korea says, "What kind of judicial murder is this?" It's a political investigation. How can you say this like that? Do you tell CEO Han Dong-hoon the special prosecutor that he has to be investigated by the prosecution? Is it true that the Democratic Party of Korea wants to conduct an independent counsel on the issue of the party bulletin board? Why should the special prosecutor reveal the problem of managing our party's bulletin board? It really doesn't add up. I don't know what the Democratic Party would think if I said this before talking about it, but they keep insisting on our party and saying that the Yoon Suk Yeol government should do it because it was so bad. How many amazing things happened at the time of the Moon Jae In government a few years ago? Should I give you an example? The murder of a civil servant in the West Sea and the issue of sending North Koreans back were the issues that really needed to be investigated. But of course, we didn't push because we had a small number, but if we respect the president at least, what would be the intention of continuing the special investigation with only unfounded suspicions on the market? In the end, let's continue to shake the government, paralyze the state administration, and eventually impeach the president with what's happening in the process, right? So, I don't know why I'm talking about the Special Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon Act, but it's very unfortunate and difficult to understand.

◆ Shin Yul: I see. Thank you. Thank you for your words today. Thank you. So far, he was Shin Dong-wook, the spokesman for the People's Power Party.