[Talking] Cho Jung-hoon, "Yeouido's grammar is the best." Jung Kwang-jae, "Special prosecutor? There is a difference in interpretation." Park Joo-min, "Do you want to dig in between?" "I have to work on it".

Amid fierce factional conflict due to the controversy over the bulletin board of the People's Power Party, the closeness side is taking out a stronger card.

It even hinted at the possibility of a departure vote in the re-vote of the Special Prosecutor's Office Act scheduled for the 10th of next month.

In response, CEO Han Dong-hoon made a significant statement yesterday. "Not what I said"

How did pro-Yoon-gye interpret it? Rep. Cho Jung-hoon said in an interview this morning that a representative seems to have become the best grammar player in Yeouido, and pointed out that he would end the marital fight if he dragged it to court.

[Cho Jung-hoon / National People's Power (CBS Kim Hyun-jung's news show): When a so-called close acquaintance made such a statement, he said, 'I didn't say it.' I think he became the best in Yeouido grammar. Either you say no, or what do you mean by 'I didn't say that?' I think it's an ambiguous statement that can lead to a wide variety of interpretations. If it's this party's bulletin board debate, it's a debate. If you are worried about connecting the special prosecutor Kim Gun-hee in the future, it is not the head of the ruling party, but the head of the opposition party. The Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor Act is called the Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor Act, but what the Democratic Party is pushing for and the opposition is the Yoon Suk Yeol Act on the Collapse of Government. No matter how much infighting there is in the party, we cannot agree to the law on the collapse of the regime, which gives up the ruling party. You can have a marital fight. But it's in the house, which means that if you take the couple's fight to court, it'll be over.]

The close circle seems to be taking a cautious approach to the remarks of Kim's special prosecutor's card.

But I can also sense a strange atmosphere.

Chung Kwang-jae, spokesman for People's Power, said, "In the past, it is unconstitutional. If it was such a firm position that "I oppose it with the party's theory," now it seems that there is a kind of difference in interpretation in Han's words.

[Jung Kwang-jae / People's Power Spokesperson (YTN News Fighting): You said it wasn't your story. In that article, as long as the shaking of the party leader continues, the point was that he would consider the special prosecutor's card, but he said he didn't tell the story, and how much has changed from the past and now? There seems to be a kind of difference in interpretation of what the party leader said. In the past, he said, "The unconstitutionality is strong." He even said he opposed it almost with party theory, but now he has nothing to say. I think there are some differences in interpretation, but I don't think that if the vote is held today, more than eight votes will be passed, and the party leader doesn't think he will approve of the special prosecution.]

The Democratic Party is paying attention to the cracks in factional conflict within the ruling party.

In particular, Rep. Park Joo-min said he had already contacted his close circle in the past, and predicted that he would work to dig into the cracks of conflict to pass the special prosecution for Kim.

However, he criticized that some of the remarks made by close acquaintances are worth noting and annoying.

[Park Joo-min / Rep. Kim Tae-hyun's political show] For your information, after the meeting between Representative Han Dong-hoon and President Yoon Suk Yeol ended in a strange form, close lawmakers were angry at that time. Come and negotiate with me actually. Walk over. We can't step up. I talked about this. (Really? Who?) How do you reveal that here? Once again, there was this atmosphere in the past. (Is the Democratic Party trying to dig in and pass the special prosecutor's office?), it should be done (for example, marking close lawmakers as sweatshirts).) I have to do those things now. That's why I paid attention to this writing. It's called "a card to prevent the party leader from shaking." We have to do it for the people. Then it's going straight. This is a card to prevent the party leader from shaking. It means, 'Hey, if you stop shaking it, I won't do it either.' That's why I'm saying this. I'm a little annoyed.]