[On-site video+] Kwon Sung-dong, "Isn't it protecting the president..."Protecting Korea".

[Anchor]
Today (4th), the weekend, the People's Power will hold an emergency assembly meeting to discuss the direction of the party's response to the attempt to arrest President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Attention is also being paid to whether there will be comments related to the National Assembly's impeachment trial decision to withdraw the crime of rebellion from the reason for President Yoon's impeachment.

Let's go to the general assembly.

[Kwon Seongdong / People's Power Floor Leader]
It's the first general meeting of lawmakers in the new year.

I wish our senior colleagues a happy new year and good luck. Yesterday, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit attempted to execute an unfair presidential arrest warrant.

South Korea is a rule of law country.

In rule of law countries, even if it takes time, investigations and truths must be made based on the procedures set by law.

That is the rule of law and the constitutional spirit of the Republic of Korea.

It is not the president's protection that we criticize the execution of the presidential arrest warrant by the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit.

It's about protecting the law of law, protecting the rule of law, and protecting the Republic of Korea.

The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit does not have the right to investigate the crime of rebellion. Nevertheless, an arrest warrant was requested from the Seoul Western District Court, and the Western District Court recognized the right to investigate rebellion by the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit without a legal basis. The judiciary encouraged confusion in the investigation system.

In addition, the judge put in a clause that makes exceptions to Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act without any reason or grounds in the warrant.Is there a judge above the

law?

It is a serious challenge to legislative power for judges to put extra-legal exceptions in their warrants at their disposal.

The judge is above the law.

The presidential residence is a first-class military secret protection facility.

The judge virtually urged the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit to violate the Military Confidential Protection Act. As the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit committed extra-legal acts, the military and police have now begun to commit sedition.

The military and the police refused to comply with the command of the security chief on the logic that they did not necessarily have to follow the request for cooperation from the security chief.

If you weren't going to respond to cooperation, you shouldn't have come to the place at all.

However, the military opened the front gate of the presidential residence to the arrest team of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit at the scene.

The police did not even comply with the acting president's order to cooperate.

It's a clear demeanor that goes beyond cooperation.

Now, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is even showing a vicious behavior of strongly asking Acting President Choi Sang-mok for cooperation.

I demand it as if I were ordering the acting president.

The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, which has not shown any role or function for the past four years, is showing extremely political behavior, saying it will show off its reason for existence.

I want you to stop it right away. I hope the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit will take care not to add to the social confusion and unhappiness surrounding the execution of the presidential arrest warrant.

Since its establishment in 2021, the Airborne has only five cases prosecuted.

As the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit investigates the crime of rebellion that has no investigative power, it is trying to arrest the president by receiving illegal and illegal warrants. How are you going to investigate the rebellion when the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit can't properly investigate the case of Corporal Chae?

It's like an anchovy running in to swallow a whale.

In addition, the investigation into civil war crimes by the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is extremely biased in terms of human composition in addition to procedures and capabilities.

Choi Jang-woo, the prosecutor of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit's emergency martial law task force, is from the law firm LKB.

I'm from the LKB Kwon Do-hyung attorney's office. Like this, the LKB and the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit are actually one body attached to the front and back of a business card.

Lee Kwang-byeon, a lawyer for the National Assembly's impeachment law firm, is a founding member of the Korean Law Research Association, the founder and de facto representative of the LKB.

He was even mentioned as the first Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit in the opposition party.

Lee Kwang-beom, a lawyer for the impeachment lawyers, led the foundation of the Korean Law Research Association when he was a judge.

Both the constitutional judges recommended by the Democratic Party and the judges who issued unfair arrest warrants are members of the Korean Law Research Association. After all, the investigative agency, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, the law of the National Assembly that prosecutes impeachment, and the Constitutional Court in charge of the impeachment trial are all linked to the Democratic Party and the LKB.

It is unacceptable given that a fairer due process is needed more than ever.

The main cases that the LKB has been in charge of have been the violation of the Public Official Election Act by Lee Jae-myung, the Democratic Party's leader, the former minister Cho Kuk's corruption of entrance exams, former Governor Kim Kyung-soo's Druking case, and former representative Song Young-gil's spraying of money envelopes at the national convention.