Yoon Suk Yeol President's Arrest Warrant Enforcement 'Countdown'

■ Host: Anchor Lee Hyun-woong and Anchor Kim Jung-jin
■ Starring: Lawyer Sohn Soo-ho

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News Special] when quoting.

[Anchor]
Let's also talk about related legal issues. Lawyer Son Soo-ho is currently in the studio. Welcome, lawyer. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police continue to gather in front of the official residence, and as reporter Kim Da-hyun told me earlier, the security service was also able to gather a little more. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit has sent a letter of cooperation to the command and subordinates, and they say they will hold them civil and criminal responsibility if they interfere with the execution of the warrant. Please explain this part.

[Sonho]
First of all, the premise was that the warrant was legally requested and issued. Therefore, the act of executing such a warrant is also a legitimate execution of public affairs, so if it interferes with the legitimate execution of public affairs, there is a possibility of criminal obstruction of public affairs. And if you cause property damage to someone in the process, there is a possibility that the liability for compensation will follow. Therefore, it is understood that such a message was sent to emphasize that it is the current lawful execution of public affairs and to prevent further acts that unfairly and illegally block the execution of public affairs.

[Anchor]
I'm also interested in what my subordinates will do, but I think they've announced a policy that they won't punish their subordinates even if they don't follow orders from above.

[Sonho]
That's right. Just a moment ago, I said the most general principles, but if there is the same situation as at the time of the first warrant execution or there is a more violent resistance, there is a possibility that all participants will be legally liable. But it's important to prevent that from happening. In addition, it is not necessary to comply with unfair orders because the priority is to prevent such a thing from happening. And even if they don't comply, they seem to have emphasized the areas where they don't take legal responsibility, but on the contrary, they do take legal responsibility if they follow an unfair order from their superiors. In the meantime, various confusion has been reported within the security office, and as time goes by, each security office employee has been informed of their concerns about how to deal with the situation. In that sense, he seems to have explained various current situations and talked about how individual officials should behave so as not to interfere with the legitimate execution of public affairs today.

[Anchor]
I will tell you the situation in front of Hannam-dong residence. You've seen it through the screen.Unlike the direction of progress on the road, I was able to see the police bus blocking the road. You can see it as completely controlling the lane in front of the official residence. Currently, there is news that nearby vehicles are being guided by detours. The more so, the more imminent the execution of the second arrest warrant, but the lane in front of Hannam-dong's official residence is completely blocked and the vehicle is being diverted. For your information, you can check the screen in front of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. You can see that the reporters are gathered and that the main gate is currently firmly closed. We continue to deliver the appearance in front of the official residence, and many people continue to gather in the official residence and at the entrance of the official residence. Earlier, reporter Kim Da-hyun also told me that lawmakers of the People's Power are gathering, is there any additional news?

[Reporter]
First of all, Yoon Sang-hyun, a member of the People's Power, appeared first at the entrance to his residence early in the morning. I told you that he appeared at around 3:30 p.m. Since then, lawmakers of the People's Power have continued to gather, and as I said, the lanes are completely controlled in front of the Hannam-dong official residence, so they are taking a detour. However, we need to keep a close eye on the lane control situation now because there is a possibility that fire engines or special vehicles may enter this road, so we need to keep a close eye on this situation.

[Anchor]
This is how lawmakers are gathering. We can't rule out the possibility of scrumming and blocking, but if so, we can get caught red-handed, is it possible to get this observation?

[Sonho]
That's a possibility. First of all, we need to look at the crime of obstructing the execution of public affairs, but it is established when an assault or threat is made against a public official who executes his/her duties. However, the precedent requires more legitimate job execution in addition to the job execution. We need to interpret the assault or intimidation mentioned here. Assault in the crime of obstructing the execution of public affairs is not an assault that is established only when someone is hit. I think it's assault and intimidation in a broader sense. Therefore, even if you don't directly price, if you exercise tangible power, it could be a crime of assault for obstructing the execution of public affairs, so there is a good possibility that you will be judged as a crime. And even if you are a member of the National Assembly or an incumbent member of the National Assembly, if you are currently committing a crime, you can of course be recognized as a red offender, and in that case, you can be arrested. You have the privilege of not being arrested.E does not apply to current offenders, so I hope that, if anything, that doesn't happen.The possibility of something quite unsavory happening cannot be ruled out theoretically.

[Anchor]
Earlier, during the first round of execution, he arrived at his residence and was blocked by a backlash from the security service at around 1:30 p.m., five and a half hours after the execution of the warrant, and eventually stopped the execution. This time, I think he would have paid more attention to this part, but he shook the command system in advance because of the forced investigation into the command of the security agency. You saw this as a strategy. What do you think about the possibility of securing Kim Sung-hoon's new recruits this time? Is it possible?

[Sonho]
It is possible. It's possible, and a warrant has already been issued. Since an arrest warrant has been issued, it is possible to execute the legally issued warrant at any time. Therefore, the police are currently executing a warrant for Deputy Chief Kim Sung-hoon, and the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is executing a warrant against the president. If you look at the form of execution today to achieve your goal, you must have had various concerns within the police and with the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. But the first and most important thing today is to execute the warrant issued. Also, it's hard to say that the second priority is to prevent any mishaps in the execution process. I think the third is to minimize inconvenience to nearby residents and people. However, in order to meet all these things at once, the security agency must first secure the new recruits of Deputy Chief Kim Sung-hoon or weaken the resistance within the security agency by securing the recruits, or the security agency personnel must protect the president first. I think that's how the law was interpreted, inside the security service. However, there is a possibility that the deputy head of the security service may be confused in various ways because there is no basis and justification for the security service personnel, even if they want to protect them emotionally. So, even considering this aspect, it seems highly likely that he will first execute an arrest warrant for Deputy Chief Kim Sung-hoon.

[Anchor]
We're continuing to show you on the screen, but a little while ago, the airlift vehicle was confirmed to be moving near the official residence. The security guards at the official residence are also gathering one after another, and you are seeing what we are seeing now and in front of the official residence in Hannam-dong, Seoul. The investigation team of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is also trying to enter after wearing a vest. There's also a story like this. We strongly expected it to be executed at 5 o'clock, but it's past 5:03. You are currently looking in front of the Hannam-dong residence. The vehicle of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit was also confirmed to be moving, and we can also check the video of the officials of the official residence security office being connected one after another.

[Anchor]
Earlier, it was reported that the vehicle of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit arrived in front of the official residence, and additionally, the vehicle was able to be seen leaving, but the interview is being conducted in front of the official residence. Do you think it's lawyer Yoon Gap-geun? You can see some of the documents being shown, and you can see the question-and-answer with the reporters. It seems that they are expressing their position on enforcement, but we will tell you what is delivered about it once more when the content comes in. In front of the official residence, there is also a bodyguard, and you can see the police and personnel from the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit gathering together. Currently, it is a little after 5:04 and 5 o'clock, but it is expected that the arrest will begin. We talked about armed conflict earlier.Didn't some people talk about guns and knives? There shouldn't be such a situation, but what would be the legal responsibility if such a situation happened?

[Sonho]
It's hard to imagine, and I hope it doesn't happen.It is difficult to avoid legal liability if such an incident occurs. First of all, the most important thing is what kind of crime will be criminally. Basically, what you can think of is obstruction of justice. It is a crime that occurs when an assault or threat is made against a public official who executes his/her duties. However, there is a rule that is more strongly punished in the general, basic obstruction of public affairs, which is the obstruction of the execution of special public affairs. If you show group or multiple power or commit a crime of obstructing the execution of public affairs by carrying dangerous objects, the sentence is to be increased by half. There is also a possibility of establishing such a crime of obstruction of the execution of special public affairs. In addition, if a public official is injured by committing a crime of obstructing the execution of special public affairs, he or she is sentenced to three years or more in prison. It's a terrible thing again.Ma could face up to life in prison or more than five years in case of death. Each has a crime of injury and a crime of death. I don't want this to happen.

[Anchor]
We continue to show you the screen, but the president's lawyers have also been confirmed. Lawyer Yoon Gap-geun is seen talking with reporters in front of his Hannam-dong residence while pushing various documents, and he is seen protesting against the execution of the warrant. We will deliver the details as soon as we are covered. The defense's position against the execution of the warrant. What are the legal aspects that we should focus on?

[Sonho]
First of all, the most fundamental part of the conflict between the current president and the investigative agency is the legality of issuing a warrant. Since it is a warrant that was legally requested and not legally issued by the president in the first place, the subsequent execution is not a legitimate execution of official affairs. Therefore, the president continues to express his position that he does not have to respond and cannot respond. On the other hand, the investigative agency's request for a warrant was legal and also legally issued by the court, and after that, in the law, I actually saw it for the first time. I challenged the warrant, and I thought the court wouldn't even answer it.Ma is a very unusual situation, and I've never seen it before, but I answered it. However, despite going through such an objection process, the court once again saw that such a warrant was legal. In such a situation, the arguments of both sides are completely opposed to the legality of issuing a warrant, so in the end, today's execution has become a regrettable situation that is eventually heading into a conflict situation.

[Anchor]
It points out that the warrant issuance is illegal and problematic, but it seems to be protesting against the issuing entity.

[Sonho]
That's right. I'm making a lot of points. First of all, the first part is about who has the right to investigate. Under the current regulations, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit cannot investigate the president for treason. Therefore, it is unfair and illegal for the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit to have jurisdiction over the investigation. It is also raising the issue of the competent court that requested an arrest warrant from the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. In other words, why did you make a claim to the wrong place when you had to make a claim to the Seoul Central District Court? I'm also pointing out these things. However, so far, there is no legal way to dispute the validity of the warrant issued, and it seems that only the legality process remains after arrest to argue. Under these circumstances, the president has essentially argued that this investigation and the request, issuance and execution of this warrant are all illegal and invalid.

[Anchor]
President Yoon pointed out the logic of the application for an injunction for suspension of the validity of the warrant, but he said he would not admit the arrest warrant of the Western District Court earlier. How should we interpret this part from a legal point of view?

[Sonho]
It's not without controversy. Of course, it hasn't been long since the Corruption Investigations Unit was created, and there are parts that can be interpreted in the Corruption Investigations Unit Act. In addition, in this case, even if the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit has the right to investigate, the prosecution must prosecute again after the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit investigates. Because of these various complex situations, the arguments of both sides seem to have mixed legal interpretations. But basically, where to claim a warrant depends on what kind of warrant it is and which court is appropriate according to the type of warrant, but basically in this situation, it is difficult to find a rule that a specific court must request a warrant. Of course, the president interprets that this should be filed with the Seoul Central District Court.It's not easy to interpret it like that when you look at the laws and regulations.

[Anchor]
It's difficult for us to confirm the precedents right now, right?

[Sonho]
That's right. As a result, since the president has filed a claim with the Western District Court, which has jurisdiction over Yongsan-gu, and the court has also decided that it is a legitimate warrant request, the lawfulness of this warrant can be questioned and various actions can be taken depending on their position.Ma said this warrant is illegal, invalid. It is somewhat unreasonable to act on the premise.

[Anchor]
We continue to show you the front of our official residence in Hannam-dong, Seoul at this time. As you can see in the video, the president's lawyers are being confirmed. I can see a person who seems to be lawyer Yoon Gap-geun talking with reporters or several people. I think we can check the video that the execution of the arrest warrant is imminent.

[Anchor]
There is also a very urgent situation in the official residence, but there is also news that the security service is rearranging the bus vehicle. It seems to be building a cordon, reporter Kim Da-hyun, I think there will be some scenarios we expect. For now, we put in so much manpower. It's called rip-off, and several people break up the cordon one by one. This kind of scenario is possible, right?

[Reporter]
That's right. First of all, the police plan to successfully execute this warrant by putting in a considerable amount of manpower. So, as you said, there is a possibility that a group of four or four people can join the team to pull out the security guards who resist the execution of the warrant, arrest them, and transfer them to the detention center. The most important thing is the arrest and search team. It is a group that is put into the official residence and actually identifies the position of President Yoon and arrests him. However, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is in charge of executing the president's arrest warrant, which seems to have put about 40 people into the presidential residence in Hannam-dong today. I'm telling you that it's arriving one after another.

[Anchor]
Let me ask the lawyer again. How we should see the intention to prosecute instead of an arrest warrant. As reporter Kim Da-hyun said just now, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is the main agent, so I won't admit it.How should we look at this legally? I don't know if I should look at it like this because I intend to delay arrest

[Sonho]
That's a possibility. It seems difficult to avoid such an interpretation. This is because, of course, the president has been expressing their unfairness very strongly after making his own legal judgment and reaching a conclusion. But there seem to be some parts that are a little hard to accept, and so is the matter of the jurisdiction court. In addition, the issue of investigative power seems to have been sorted out for now, but the parts that continue to be pointed out about this. In addition, an arrest warrant is ultimately intended to make an arrest. Arrest is to find someone, catch them, bring them in and investigate. Therefore, just because an arrest warrant is issued, requested, and executed does not mean that you are arrested, nor are you prosecuted, nor are you convicted and confirmed at trial. However, the president seems to judge himself that it is very likely that it will flow like that. That's why it seems to be resisting quite strongly from the first step, the execution of the arrest warrant. That's why I'm making various claims legally.I think these are actually measures to buy time for now. Prosecute immediately again. Or ask for an arrest warrant. Of course, I understand what background it is. And it's understandable that you do what's most favorable to you. However, it is difficult to accept from a legal point of view. Because it's the subject of investigation. Of course, I need to be respected as an incumbent president and I need to be considerate of everything since I'm still in the office.Ma is currently the subject of investigation. And he's a suspect. In addition, an arrest warrant has been issued. In such a situation, there is no legal basis for the suspect to make a proposal and make a choice after judging that he or she cannot comply with some procedures. I can make a request and make a suggestion.Ma is an unenforceable and unenforceable part. Therefore, even if an arrest warrant is executed, all it takes is to go to an investigative agency and receive an investigation based on questions and answers. However, it is difficult to accept from a legal point of view to ask for an arrest warrant that goes one step further than that or to go further and prosecute without investigation.

[Anchor]
Chief of Staff Jeong Jin-seok said, "Is it appropriate for the Republic of Korea to see the incumbent president being handcuffed and taken away by investigators? We talked about the possibility of a third place or a visit survey while saying, "Is this a disgrace?" Is there a possibility that it will be done?

[Sonho]
At the moment, it looks very thin. Of course, it's not impossible to conduct an investigation in a third place. There have been precedents. There's also no rule that they must be investigated by an investigative agency. That's the principle.Ma can also be done in a third place. But it can be seen as some kind of preferential treatment. And it's also practically a preferential treatment. In addition, in the current situation, the president's refusal to comply with law enforcement continues for a long time. In such a situation, it seems that it will not be easy for investigative agencies to take such measures that can be seen as preferential treatment to the president. Therefore, if an arrest warrant is executed according to the principle and an investigation is conducted today, I think it will be carried out according to the principle.

[Anchor]
The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit did not specify the date of the warrant this time. In the first round, I received it for about 7 days, but in the second round, I didn't set a specific date for about 2 weeks. Is it possible to execute additional warrants today? What happens after that?

[Sonho]
I'll tell you under the premise that it's such a legitimate warrant in the context of an arrest warrant. It's going to be executed, and you can try to execute it several times. So just because you failed once you tried it doesn't mean you return the warrant.

[Anchor]
Is there no limit to the number of attempts?

[Sonho]
That's right. However, it has to be done within that period because there is an expiration date. So if you don't succeed in arresting the president today like last time, you can try again within the expiration date. However, if we fail to arrest the president today, the warrant will remain valid.Ma is also concerned about whether there will be any power left considering the practical aspects. Therefore, it is known that the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police made various preparations to achieve their goals today.

[Anchor]
Director of Airborne Oh Dong-woon prepared thoroughly. What will happen to the position of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit if the second arrest warrant fails again?

[Sonho]
The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is actually at the center of the controversy. There were quite a few concerns when it was first introduced. The criminal justice system and investigation system centered on the prosecution and the police, which have been accumulated for decades, have changed considerably. Moreover, at the same time, the relationship between the prosecution and the police has changed considerably. As a result, there was a concern that there might be confusion in the procedural aspect, but there are also some of those aspects. In addition, it seems that there was some consensus on the introduction of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit due to the need to check the prosecution when the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit was introduced. But wasn't it too hasty? And there was also a point that there was a possibility of unthinkable institutional confusion, conflicts, defects, and overlaps in regulations, but I think the cause of the situation was more important than a close analysis, thorough review, and supplementation. As a result, the Airborne Division was introduced and the Airborne Division began its work.It seems that there are advantages and disadvantages, there are also gains, and there are various confusion. In such a situation, some pointed out what the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit has done so far. Of course, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit does not have to investigate and produce results and lead to various punishments. The existence of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit itself will not be without a national function. However, it must be painful from the point of view of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit that the investigation into the president has not produced any significant results despite various attempts to investigate, but it seems that the public's view is not so favorable.

[Anchor]
We continue to show you the view in front of the official residence in Hannam-dong, Seoul, in real time. As you can see on the right screen, lawyer Yoon Gap-geun is strongly protesting. We can't hear the voice or the situation on the spot, but it has been confirmed several times that we are holding a document envelope and restraining it with our hands. It's an unjust execution, and now the citizens who are very strongly protesting against the execution of arrest warrants and filming with various cameras are also being confirmed. We can't confirm it in detail with sound, but we're seeing strong opposition and holding a document envelope and restraining it with our hands. First of all, the parts of unjust execution and legitimate execution are confronting each other. Please summarize the issue of which position we should focus on the most.

[Sonho]
First of all, when it comes to politics, it seems to be tight. I don't think it's tight in legal terms. First of all, the warrant was issued and the president has raised various issues several times in the past at the current execution stage.Ma is not recognized. Therefore, it would be correct to think that it is legal to issue a warrant under the current law. In such a situation, it is reasonable to view today's execution as a legitimate execution of public affairs and law. However, it is also necessary to listen to the argument that this is not the case. Also, the Supreme Court has finally decided or our judiciary has not officially confirmed that the request, issuance, and execution of this warrant is justified. There was no such procedure until now, so both sides' arguments have something to listen to so far. However, the expression of tightness itself seems to have a slight fishing problem. So, legally, since the warrant was issued unfairly and illegally in the current situation, it seems difficult to say that it is okay to block and block it by not responding to execution and using physical force. Now, of course, the president's defense is likely to make various arguments and try to stop today's execution of this warrant, and it seems that they're doing it now.In summary, it seems like two things come out when you go up to the top. The first will be the validity and legality of the warrant. And this warrant is an arrest warrant, and the reason why the arrest warrant is talked about so many times is that the president did not respond to the request for attendance. In other words, there are many steps and procedures and processes in the investigation.Investigation without detention is the priority. And you have to conduct a voluntary investigation before a forced investigation. The most basic of voluntary investigations is to ask for attendance and then ask questions and listen to answers. However, since they do not respond to these most basic and first things, they have no choice but to bring them and investigate them. For this purpose, an arrest warrant was requested and issued. Then, why did you investigate? Because there are allegations. And what other charges? Since you are a sitting president, you cannot be subject to an investigation even if you assume and presuppose that you have committed most crimes. You will be investigated after leaving office. However, exceptionally, in the case of civil war and foreign exchange crimes, even the incumbent president can be investigated and prosecuted and punished. Ultimately, the most fundamental political rise due to the act is confusing because of such differences in legal and political judgment.

[Anchor]
The president's lawyers' position continues to emerge and they are protesting against the execution of arrest warrants, so I will tell you what is being told about it. According to the Military Facilities Protection Act, if there is no approval under Article 111, the contents were excluded at the time of the execution of the first arrest warrant, but the lawyers say that the new warrant does not apply, so they are confronting each other like that. So if there is no statement that excludes the application of Articles 110 and 111 to the execution of an arrest warrant, could the situation be different?

[Sonho]
I don't think so. In the first place, in the case of warrants, there are cases where third parties are not allowed to read them. So I couldn't check either. In such a situation, in principle, if this arrest warrant is issued and the warrant is not executed within the expiration date and the warrant must be re-claimed and the period is renewed. But as far as I know, it's supposed to be attached to the back in this case, a new warrant. That's how it's done. If so, I don't know if you're pointing out that the attached document doesn't have the same entry. However, even if it is not, there is no big problem. Because military secrets and confiscation in Article 110 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and official secrets and confiscation in Article 111. Of course, a place where legal regulations exist and therefore military secrets are required cannot be seized and searched without the consent of the person in charge. And that's the case with official secrets. But these are regulations in the Criminal Procedure Act and there are things that are higher than that. That's the warrant. Since it is a warrant issued by the court under the Constitution and law, it is reasonable to interpret it as taking precedence over the provisions of Articles 110 and 111 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Therefore, the first arrest warrant raised a very big problem because it stated a special provision, but in fact, personally, I don't think such a description itself is necessary. It is not possible to exclude the regulations mentioned earlier and conduct a search in the process of executing an arrest warrant only if such regulations are written, but can be done without such regulations. It's right to interpret it like that. Rather, I didn't see the warrant in person because I thought that the listing of such regulations on the warrant raised the controversy, but even if there is no provision that excludes the application as the president's current position, it would be right to see that there are no legal problems with the execution of today's arrest warrant and the execution of search warrants issued together for the execution of the arrest warrant.

[Anchor]
I keep showing it through the video, but there is news that the police have deployed a special tow truck. It is speculated that the purpose may be to remove obstacles to the security service. The screen shown on the left is the image of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. The screen on the right shows the situation of various personnel, including lawyer Yoon Gap-geun, as previously mentioned. The security service is rearranging buses or vehicles and appears to be trying to build a cordon around the residence. Barbed-wire fences are installed and double barriers are installed around the official residence, so the situation seems to be continuing strongly. There is also news that buses are also being used at guard posts. [Anchor] It is said that the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police have presented arrest and search warrants and are confronting the security service. According to the president's legal representatives, if there is an illegal invasion disguised as the execution of public affairs, the security service will be carried out by the security service manual, and the entire process will be thoroughly collected and all those involved will be held strictly legally responsible. What legal responsibility are you going to hold?

[Sonho]
Since the president's premise presupposes that the request, issuance, and execution of warrants are all illegal acts, there seems to be some controversy over whether such legal interpretation is correct. But let me presuppose it. If the president's position is correct, today's warrant execution itself is all groundless. Therefore, because it is an act of trying to enter the presidential residence by illegally mobilizing police forces, etc., the act itself can cause various legal problems and violate all such laws. If so, it can be a crime in itself, and it can also cause a lot of political controversy, which seems to be a warning in this respect. Of course, no legal judgment has been made for the act. However, considering the situation so far, the president's position can be understood in part.E has no choice but to raise considerable questions about how right the interpretation is legally.

[Anchor]
We are continuing to talk after receiving the official position of the president's legal representatives. In this regard, it is emphasized that in the event of an illegal invasion disguised as the execution of public affairs to the presidential residence, security services can be carried out according to the security service's manual. You're emphasizing obstruction of justice, aren't you?

[Sonho]
That's right. The positions of the two sides are completely at odds. Since it is a legitimate warrant from the perspective of the investigative agency, you can execute an arrest warrant today to arrest the president and investigate. That's the purpose. On the other hand, the president continues to deny the validity of the warrant itself and is making various efforts not to be arrested. But there are many possibilities to avoid arrest. The first is for the investigative agency to stop executing the warrant. Then you won't be arrested. Second, even if the investigative agency tries to execute the warrant, even if it tries to enter the official residence, it is considered illegal to block the execution of the warrant, and if it is suppressed, it is physically countered to prevent it from entering, or even if it enters, the president can block the execution of the warrant even in this case. But in order to do that, you basically have to use physical force. It's currently unclear how many personnel in the security service will follow orders from the leadership, but only if someone uses physical force and stops it, can they stop the investigative agency's attempt to execute today. If so, I'll see it as an illegal intrusion, a security manual that I keep emphasizing. Since it is an illegal trespassing without a legal basis, various deterrents or measures can be taken to make it go back out of the official residence. And it also seems that the bodyguards continue to emphasize the areas that need to be taken.

[Anchor]
While the president's legal representatives continued to protest against the execution of the warrant, we were able to see some of the vehicles of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit going up and down through the screen. You could see the troops moving.