President Yoon's warrant hearing is over...What's the court's decision?

■ Host: Anchor Cho Jin-hyuk, anchor Hwang Seo-yeon
■ Starring: Choi Soo-young, political critic, Cha Jae-won, special professor at Busan Catholic University

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News Special] when quoting.


[Anchor]
Now, only the results of the actual examination of the arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk Yeol remain. It's expected to come out as early as this morning. Let's talk with Choi Soo-young, a political critic, and Cha Jae-won, a special professor at Busan Catholic University. Welcome. The whole nation is staying up all night now. First of all, I'd like to ask you carefully about your prospects for how the results will come out. First of all, what do you think of critic Choi Soo-young?

[Choi Soo-young]
Today's warrant review ended at 6 p.m. because it didn't make it to 6 p.m. Then, immediately after that, the judge asked whether he should issue it or reject it, but it has already been about six hours. If so, in fact, it means that the time for deliberation is getting longer than the time of the hearing, but if so, it's time for me to come out at all. It's past 1 a.m. I carefully predict that it will come out within an hour or two, but anyway, the judge's deliberation is getting this long because it was a relatively simple issue in the initial hearing process, and it wasn't that long to point out each other's facts, but I think the long period of deliberation is to make a more careful judgment. Therefore, many people expect it to be issued, but I carefully predict that there is a high possibility of dismissal.

[Anchor]
Then, when do you think Professor Cha Jae-won will come out?

[Borrowing]
I don't think it'll take that long either. However, this issue itself is actually unprecedented. Since it is the first time in history that an arrest warrant has been requested for an incumbent president, the court has no choice but to do everything carefully, and the other is the severity of the charges. In fact, the crime of rebellion is exempted from the privilege of the incumbent president to remove fluoride because it is nothing else but the crime of rebellion of the incumbent president. If so, I think that the issuance or dismissal of a warrant on this part will inevitably have a significant impact on the future trial process, so it will have no choice but to be quite cautious. On the other hand, there was a dispute about jurisdiction now. Because of those parts, I wonder if he is trying to show his best to avoid a single legal dispute because the Seoul Western District Court is conducting a warrant review. I think it will probably be issued more than 90% on the issue of issuing warrants. As I just said, the issue is very serious and there are a lot of testimonies and witnesses about it. And the other thing is that President Yoon virtually refused to execute the arrest warrant when it was issued. In fact, these parts are directly related to such concerns about the destruction of evidence if they are dismissed. Those are the things that probably work, so I'm pretty likely to get a warrant. I predict that.

[Anchor]
First of all, the two of you suggested a slightly different outlook. First of all, the review is continuing. Originally, President Yoon Suk Yeol announced his position not to attend, but now he changed his position yesterday morning. It is known that the lawyers persuaded you, but how do you see the background of your attendance?

[Choi Soo-young]
I think the background where the two things turned around will be the background. Because the first one is the arrest warrant issued by the Western District Court, and it is illegal and unfair for President Yoon and his lawyers. This is because the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit does not have the authority to investigate the crime of rebellion. However, anyway, since it was rejected by the arrest suit, I think the defense team should go and explain it. But the problem is that the judge in charge of warrants issued arrest warrants twice at that time, but Judge Cha Eun-kyung is not a judge in charge of warrants today. So, I was a general judge who was originally sentenced, but I was on duty over the weekend, so I think I thought we should get another judgment from a new judge because they were not the judges who issued arrest warrants in the past. It would have been better if it had been more neutral, and of course, it would have been better if it had been done in the Central District Court, but since it is done in the Western District Court anyway, the first thing is that the president seems to have changed his mind. The second is this important, but in fact, issuing an arrest warrant does not cover the guilt or innocence. I could not think much of it at first because this is the part of whether a new person is detained or not, but if you look closely at the constitutional decision and high-ranking governance when the president declares martial law that day, it can be a preliminary constitutional hearing. The president should do that. So even in this part where my recruits are detained this time, I explained why I had to make constitutional decisions and governance, and if the judge admits it, the arrest warrant will of course be rejected, but it is a very important point where the president's legitimacy is recognized in future trials and investigations. For those two reasons, I think the fact that the president attended in person and explained for about 50 minutes today and made the closing remarks for five minutes at the end reflects such motivation and enthusiasm.

[Anchor]
How did you see it when you attended and explained the legitimacy of emergency martial law and the logic of not establishing a rebellion?

[Borrowing]
There's definitely that aspect. Lawyer Seok Dong-hyun also posted a nuance that the president's direct explanation of his position after attending the warrant hearing today seems to have worked quite well for the court. I'm sure they've taken that into account. But not only that, but I think President Yoon is actually undergoing legal review, but he is actually doing another political act. The parts that you came out and talked about today as self-nurture are soon spreading through legal representatives who were present. These are the kinds of public opinion campaigns that amplify public opinion again through the parts of the validity of martial law that I've been talking about over and over again. Regarding not only the legal judgment in the future but also related areas, if the early presidential election process is to be held if impeachment is cited, the so-called conservative camp should lay its own logical foundation so that it does not suffer from its own political logic. So it seems that he clearly has the idea of preoccupying the so-called public opinion battle, and the other is that today, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit vehicle was trapped by protesters after completing the warrant review. That's how you're trying to show your supporters a kind of message of unity, a message of support, a message of support, a message of support by coming to court yourself. If President Yoon did not come out in person today, it is likely that the number of supporters who flocked to the Western District Court would have been relatively small, and their actions would have been limited in their own way. However, if President Yoon comes out in person and sees these aspects of his legal resistance, I think he may be aiming to send a kind of political message to his supporters.

[Anchor]
You also expected that purpose. Also, was there a judgment that it would be advantageous to come out and explain in person to explain whether he was arrested or not and to clarify the charges?

[Borrowing]
Of course. However, from his point of view, he tells the story in his own way, but in our opinion, what President Yoon said in court must be well-known. In fact, the logic that President Yoon, who has lived as a lawyer all his life, is developing now does not actually make legal sense. The logic of talking about the emergency martial law as a warning or about where the two-hour civil war is, and that martial law was practiced in order to appeal to the people of the national crisis. Is this the real person who has been the prosecutor for the rest of his life? It's a really far cry from the constitutional provisions and the legal ones that we know to tilt our heads a little bit. For example, in the case of martial law, the requirements for activation should be equivalent to wartime and speculative events. But is it in accordance with the exhibition or event on December 3rd in Korea? How many lawyers can agree on those things? And the other thing is that when martial law is invoked, there are related procedures. For example, I have to go through a Cabinet meeting, was it the day before yesterday? Prime Minister Han Deok-soo came to the National Assembly Special Committee and said publicly that he did not go through the screening process of the State Council member. These parts are quite inconsistent with the logic that President Yoon is talking about. If so, even if I preached logic directly in that way, I also have a considerable question as to whether this would have convinced the court.

[Anchor]
You said that attendance at the substantive examination is also intended to gather supporters. But critic, I think it would have been more effective to rally supporters by standing in the photo line and giving a certain message at a place where supporters could hear. But I moved through the underground parking lot without saying anything. Why is this like that?

[Choi Soo-young]
In fact, the president's words always have a final meaning in a country with a five-year homeroom system. But now we have the principle of presumption of innocence. If the president sends a message about justification and legality in the process of investigating an arrest warrant, it would be more convincing to supporters, but I think it's right to talk about integration because the president maintains his status as a president and is a head of state, but I think it can be interpreted by supporters, but sending a message through the president's mouth can lead to many interpretations as an incumbent president, so I don't think he should do that. I think it was appropriate and I think it was appropriate. So, supporters may respond to the president's silence and supporters' social media posts and past video letters, but it's another matter to make an official statement while attending the court, so I think it's against the security law to be exposed to public places because the president is an incumbent president and needs to be guarded. That's why I think that's well shared in advance, but as you just said, I think that's why the supporters are gathering like that. So why is there no talk of fairness when the opposition party calls for a speed war and the opposition party calls for a delayed war? And in fact, the president's right to declare martial law is a very legitimate right under the constitution, so it is now being judged legally by the Constitutional Court. However, in the process, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit executed arrest warrants twice and tried to play politics rather than investigation. Another thing is that if the focus is on the investigation, it is possible to conduct a third place or visit investigation in consultation with the chief of security and lawyers. Is this the treatment equivalent to the status of the incumbent head of state by going ahead with the warrant and physical power twice? I think there's a little bit of anger from various supporters about that. In that respect, I think it is too much to interpret this issue a little too much with the gathering of supporters and political interpretation. Anyway, from the president's point of view, the key is to fight this issue legally, so isn't today's arrest warrant important? This is the question of whether you are tried in a free body, investigated, or detained, but this is a very important point because it is also very related to the driving force of the investigation in the future.

[Anchor]
He briefly mentioned that President Yoon Suk Yeol's supporters gathered as a protest against the criticism that the legal process is called KTX and Representative Lee Jae-myung is a slow train. I think the professor has something to say about this.

[Borrowing]
If you talk in that formal logic, you can talk about it like that.E, but I think the two issues are incomparable. Because the charges President Yoon is facing are treason. If so, the maximum sentence for rebellion is the death penalty, and the lowest-priced weapon and imprisonment. So it's a very strict punishment. I mentioned it earlier.Ma has the privilege of fluoridation by the incumbent president, but the only exceptions among them are civil war and foreign exchange crimes. That's how serious it is. In such a situation, I think it is a little absurd to directly compare the company card with the case related to the fraud of the entrance examination of children, for example, like former CEO Cho Kuk. And the other is related to President Yoon, who is now the head of the civil war. However, all of the subordinates, who can be called important mission workers, are in custody without a single exception. Some people have already been indicted and a trial is held soon, and the head of the civil war, the most important person in charge, for example, is that because of their political status as a sitting president, if this is the case, criticism has to be raised as to whether this is the realization of justice. That's why, as we simply talk about in the power of the people now, making direct and perfunctory comparisons with opposition leaders cannot be free from criticism of typical watering.

[Anchor]
First of all, the screening process is ongoing, so let's talk a little more about the screening. If you look at the screening process, it started at 2 p.m. and lasted about 4 hours and 50 minutes today. Did it take more time than expected to be judged at this length? Or was it written down? It was written

[Choi Soo-young]
In the meantime, in the case of a serious matter like this, there are a lot of issues to deal with, and there will be a lot of legal battles, but surprisingly, it ended in less than five hours. What that means is that relatively simple, it continued the flow and there weren't many issues. So I think this issue was twofold. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit must prove the charges of rebellion, and President Yoon must explain himself, and the most important thing in issuing an arrest warrant is the fear of destroying evidence and fleeing, right?
In this part, you have each other's attacks and defenses. However, the facts would have been relatively simple for me if I looked at the explanation of the rebellion charge. But the most important thing here is constitutional determination and governance. So the constitutional authority given to the president has the right to declare martial law. That is, the right to declare martial law is given to the president, but the National Assembly has the right to lift martial law. So, if you briefly organize December 3rd by time that day, the president activated it, activated it at around 10:30 a.m., and the National Assembly voted to lift it at 1 a.m. and returned at 4:30 a.m. That's why we're fighting for legal principles in this process. However, from the president's point of view, I saw the situation at the time as a paralysis of the state administration because the Democratic Party continues to impeach the president and then the budget is tyrannical and legislative. So I did it, but the moment the National Assembly invoked the right to cancel the vote, I did it. However, major workers here are now being prosecuted and tried, but these people are just so-called implementers who received what I gave as president, and I would have said, "Should I go this far?" The judge will judge this part. However, I pay attention to one thing that the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit said that he was a sure offender, but I think that the fact that he was a sure offender provided President Yoon's defense logic. You don't have to run away because you're a certain criminal. We're regular miscreants. If given time or circumstances, we could avoid it or run away, but where would a conviction that my actions were just and right go? And the president said that. Concerns about the destruction and flight of evidence also appeared this time, saying that the president was locked in the official residence, but there was no big difference when he went to the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. Then, all important workers in the official residence were indicted and put on trial, so what is there to destroy all the evidence? Rather, if there was evidence, they would have prosecuted and gone. In that respect, I think the warrant judge is very concerned about these two logics. Although it is a relatively simple framework and structured structure, I think it is a long time to think about these two because the two sides are confronting each other tightly.

[Anchor]
There is a report prepared in relation to this. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit reportedly emphasized concerns about recidivism, calling President Yoon Suk Yeol a typical conviction while seeking an arrest warrant. Yoon Suk Yeol's president countered that it doesn't make sense, asking if a second martial law is possible. I'm reporter Lee Yoon-jae.

[Reporter]
The request for an arrest warrant submitted to the Seoul Western District Court by the high-ranking public official's criminal investigation office amounts to about 150 pages. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit reportedly described President Yoon as a "typical conviction criminal" while charging him with charges such as the head of a rebellion. Political firm belief was the decisive motive for the crime. It is also known that President Yoon emphasized the need for arrest, saying that there was a risk of recidivism and the possibility of destroying evidence and fleeing, citing the fact that he replaced his mobile phone and left Telegram. President Yoon responded, calling it a "foolish story." He argued that it doesn't make sense to do emergency martial law without confidence, and that it's a story that a conviction criminal is not guilty. He also rebuffed criticism of concerns over recidivism, asking if martial law could be enforced twice under the circumstances of the Republic of Korea. Regarding the departure from Telegram, he said it was just a regular arrangement. The first real review of the arrest warrant for the current president in the constitutional history of Korea. Attention is focusing on what the court will decide on the battle between the spear of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the shield of President Yoon. This is YTN Lee Yunjae
.

[Anchor]
The high-ranking government official's criminal investigation agency has requested an arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk Yeol, but the prosecution has the authority to hand it over to trial. Therefore, the prosecution is also paying attention to whether to issue an arrest warrant for President Yoon. Next, reporter Choi Min Gi.

[Reporter]
Unlike the controversy over the "overlapping investigation" over President Yoon Suk Yeol's authority to investigate the rebellion, the prosecution has the authority to hand it over to the trial. The high-ranking government official's crime investigation office arrested President Yoon along with the police after transferring the case from the prosecution last year, but failed to draw meaningful statements during the investigation. This is because President Yoon is not responding to the investigation, saying that the high-ranking government official's criminal investigation office does not have the authority to investigate the incumbent president for rebellion and that the Western District Court is not in charge of warrant examination. In the future trial process, the prosecution, which has to hand over President Yoon to trial and maintain the indictment, is taking a careful approach to the debate during the investigation of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit has requested an arrest and arrest warrant for President Yoon to the Seoul Western District Court, but the prosecution, which has the right to prosecute, is expected to file a complaint with the Seoul Central District Court. This is because the trial of civil war accomplices, including former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, is in the Seoul Central District Court. Another variable is when the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit will hand over President Yoon's case to the prosecution. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the prosecution agreed to divide the arrest period for up to 20 days, 10 days each, but as President Yoon refuses to investigate the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, there is a possibility that he may ask the prosecution to file a prosecution earlier than expected. I'm YTN's Choi Min Gi.

[Anchor]
The independent counsel's discussion to independently investigate President Yoon Suk Yeol's allegations of civil war has been in pain. The ruling party protested that the revision of the independent counsel law passed by the opposition party would bring about a "insurrection of independent counsel Lee Jae-myung," while the Democratic Party of Korea turned its arrow to Acting President Choi Sang-mok and pressed him to accept the bill. I'm reporter Na Hye-in.

[Reporter]
The People's Power accused the Democratic Party of passing the amendment to the Insurrection Special Prosecutor Act as a trick to disturb the people. Although the charges of propaganda and instigation of foreign exchange and civil war were excluded from the investigation, they left open the possibility of a separate investigation by allowing the investigation of all cases recognized during the investigation. He claimed that he intended to conduct a second "red tape investigation" targeting the conservative camp, and that if it is implemented as it is, there will be a civil war against the special prosecutor.

[Shin Dong-wook / Senior spokesman for People's Power: It may be abused as a tool for infinite investigation targeting Lee Jae-myung's political opponents. We are planning to ask Acting President Choi Sang-mok to exercise the right to request reconsideration…. ]

[Reporter]
The Democratic Party of Korea criticized that the power of the people is still playing tricks even though it has largely accepted the demand to reduce the subject, size, and duration of the investigation. He pointed out that it is overpowering to reject the independent counsel's recommendation, which Choi Sang-mok previously used as a justification for requesting reconsideration, to a third party, the head of the Supreme Court.

[Park Chan-dae / Floor Leader of the Democratic Party (17th): Acting President Choi Sang-mok will urge you to accept and announce it immediately. Respecting the legislative power of the National Assembly is to protect the constitutional spirit of the separation of powers. ]

[Reporter]
The ruling party asked the ruling party to cooperate with the launch of the independent counsel unless it protects the civil war, and did not leave out a message to stimulate the departure vote in preparation for the re-vote of the National Assembly following the exercise of the veto. Considering the Lunar New Year holiday that follows after lawmakers from the ruling and opposition parties attend the inauguration of U.S. President Trump, the National Assembly's re-decision on the special prosecution law is expected to be possible next month at the earliest. Even if the ruling party votes to leave and pass, the special prosecutor's office may be useless if the investigation by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and the prosecution is at the end. I'm Na Hye-in from YTN.

[Anchor]
The battle between the ruling and opposition parties is intensifying as the Constitutional Court's impeachment trial of President Yoon Suk Yeol accelerates and the appeals trial of Democratic Party Chairman Lee Jae-myung for violating the election law begins in earnest. Reporter Kim Eung-gun analyzed the functional relationship between the two cases undergoing judicial proceedings and the presidential election.

[Reporter]
The day after Yoon's arrest, the People's Power focused on the issue of the trial of Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the Democratic Party. President Yoon's impeachment trial is speeding up, but representative Lee's trial is not.

[Kwon Young-se / People's Power Emergency Management Committee Chairman: The judicial process against the president is proceeding at the KTX level, and some people are sitting slowly on the slow train of judicial process. ]

[Reporter]
Ahn Cheol Soo, Yoo Seung Min and other ruling party presidential candidates also urged Lee's trial to proceed as soon as possible, saying they should reduce political turmoil.

[Ahn Cheol Soo / People's Power: Representative Lee Jae-myung's first trial ruling came out on November 15. So, the second trial should come out on February 15th and the final trial should come out on May 15th.

[Reporter] If the trial proceeds according to the
law, Lee's appeal ruling could come out before the decision of President Yoon's impeachment trial. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, dismisses the power of the people on the defensive as only trying to turn their attention to Lee's representative issue.

[Lee Kun-tae / Democratic Party of Korea member: To defend the criminal of civil war, with Lee Jae-myung's case, which has nothing to do with watering down.... ]

[Reporter]
However, as a series of recent polls show that the ruling and opposition parties' approval ratings have narrowed to the margin of error, there are internal voices that the Democratic Party of Korea has not responded properly to the impeachment process.

[Jeong Seong-ho / Minjoo Party member: The party leadership has come up with stronger measures to stabilize the people's livelihood.]

[Reporter]
Therefore, the Democratic Party is also refining its strategy to show its face as an authorized party while calling for an early impeachment trial. The court is also speeding up its trial, saying it will focus on Lee's appeal. As such, competition to win a favorable timetable in the upcoming early presidential election is expected to intensify. I'm Kim Eunggun of YTN.

[Anchor]
I'll continue the conversation with you two. I'd like to point out what we saw one by one in order in the report. First of all, I'll ask you a question about the convicted criminal. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit has referred to President Yoon Suk Yeol as a typical conviction, but lawyer Yoon Gap-geun said that a conviction criminal is not guilty. And just a moment ago, critic Choi Soo-young evaluated that he provided a clue that could dispel the fear of escape because he has confidence in my actions. Professor, how did you hear it?

[Borrowing]
Well, the part where the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit said it was a sure offender is the reason why we use the term sure offender in legal terms well. It's a term used when a person who commits a kind of crime claims justification for his or her actions and has no remorse or expression. That's why I'm a conscientious offender. It is a crime based on one's own belief. People who talk like that say that they are certain criminals. In a way, the so-called conviction criminal could talk about political conscience, but what the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit said was that Yoon's emergency martial law itself was caused by Yoon's delusions, and he continues to deny the illusion of that part. I think they're trying to highlight those parts. I said this earlier.That's the consistent logic of President Yoon. Emergency martial law was a warning martial law. And where is the two-hour martial law? And they say the move was taken to let the people know that the state was in crisis because of the brutal opposition's legislative dictatorship, but as we saw earlier, what happened during the emergency martial law on December 3rd? Part where the requirements for the invocation of emergency martial law do not comply with wartime or incident. And the other thing is that we passed the deliberation process through the Cabinet meeting, but isn't that more decisive part? In order to fundamentally block the National Assembly's demand for the lifting of the emergency martial law, the entire nation watched the scene of the army breaking the window and entering it in real-time. According to these and other military officials' statements that followed, pull out lawmakers even by shooting. Such stories are so-called evidence. Even though these parts are clear, I think he used the expression "confident criminal" with his regret for consistently defending his actions in President Yoon's delusions.

[Anchor]
In addition, we delivered a report on the judicial risk of Lee Jae-myung, chairman of the Democratic Party of Korea, and if this schedule continues, Lee Jae-myung's appeals ruling may come out before the results of the impeachment trial against President Yoon Suk Yeol. In the case of the ruling party, it is criticized that the opposition party is continuously trying to delay the legal process because it is in this situation. Could you please organize
?

[Choi Soo-young]
Right. I think there are other cases. After the Daejang-dong incident, the alleged remittance to North Korea was transferred to North Korea. All of these things have been conceded a little more than a hundred times, so I think it may be a little slow to proceed because there is a huge amount of data. However, the Public Official Election Act is very important. Our Supreme Court has set the 633 principle for six months in the first trial, three months in the second trial, and three months in the last three trials.
Why do we take the Public Official Election Act seriously? The Public Official Election Act is an aspect of preventing distortion of public sentiment. Isn't it a distortion of the public opinion that a person who ran for public office used a very unfair method to contribute to his election? This aspect is strictly controlled and that's why they take a severe disciplinary action to deprive them of their right to run for 10 years. But if this ended on November 15, it has already been 60 days. But I finally started the trial schedule. So the court in question said, "We will never take on any other case until March." I've applied to hear this case only, and the Supreme Court has allowed it, so I think this case will be exhausted now. If so, some predict that a second trial ruling may come out in mid-March or late March, but representative Lee Jae-myung did not even receive documents in the process of passing the second trial regarding the Public Official Election Act. After continuing to avoid it, it was finally received when it was delivered to the assembly hall, so the second trial is now underway. Take a look. Of course, that's the case with other issues. It is true to compare President Yoon Suk Yeol's allegations of civil war, but the Public Official Election Act is very important. That's why they are imposing heavy penalties that deprive them of their right to vote for 10 years, but why is CEO Lee Jae-myung using a strategy to delay the trial when he knows the law well even though he is a lawyer? In that sense, criticism comes out. In order for Representative Lee Jae-myung to urge the Constitutional Court hearing of President Yoon Suk Yeol at least as soon as possible, he must first make it clear that his second trial will be made within March and that he will actively cooperate with it. But not too long ago, I heard that he left early again after going to trial yesterday. Since all of these are raising considerable concerns about the realization of justice and justice of justice, I believe this is why Lee Jae-myung and the Democratic Party of Korea cannot keep sounding vain even if they keep talking about calling for an investigation into President Yoon and calling for an early hearing of the Constitutional Court.

[Anchor]
Both sides are also divided over the delay in representative Lee Jae-myung's trial. In fact, if the results of the actual examination of the College of Health and Medical Sciences come out after a few hours, what do you expect from the professor?

[Borrowing]
Whether or not the results of the warrant examination are issued, the joys and sorrows of the political community will definitely differ depending on that part. Aside from the joys and sorrows of politics, I've told you before.Considering the seriousness of President Yoon's current charges, I think that political instability in the Republic of Korea will intensify if the decision to dismiss it is made. Many of the eyes looking at our situation in foreign countries are on whether the constitutional order and law order of the Republic of Korea are working properly, but if the warrant is rejected, from their point of view, if the arrest of the incumbent president ends up in failure and the political headwind becomes bigger, political instability in Korea is likely to increase. In that case, I think that confidence in the Korean economy is likely to work in this area as well. Of course, it should not be decided by their perspective that our warrants are issued and dismissed.Ma, I'm quoting the foreign press to tell you that the expected political aftermath is that serious if it is dismissed anyway.

[Anchor]
First of all, I'm going to invite them back a little later and talk to them.