han donghoon who brought up "special inspector"...a close vote match?

■ Host: Um Ji Min Anchor, Kwon Junsu
■ Starring: Choi Chang-ryeol, Special Professor of Yongin University, Park Sang-gyu, Current Affairs Critic

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN Newswide] when quoting.

[Anchor]
Han Dong-hoon, the representative of the People's Power, has released a special inspector card to solve the problem of First Lady Kim Gun-hee.

[Anchor]
However, it has become a catalyst for a clash between pro-Yoon-gye and close circles, and the Democratic Party of Korea is raising the level of offensive in the Kim Special Counsel Act. Let's take a look at what political calculation methods are underlying with Choi Chang-ryul, a special professor at Yongin University, and Park Sang-gyu, a current affairs critic. Hello.

[Anchor]
The special inspector card taken out by CEO Han Dong-hoon. The conflict between the close and the pro-Yoon-gye is only growing, so let's first listen to the related contents.

[Han Dong-hoon / Representative of the People's Power: I reiterate as the representative of the People's Power Party. Special Inspector's recommendation. Let's proceed. For your information, I'm telling you so that there's no misunderstanding about the party leader's mission. The party leader represents the party legally and externally and is in charge of party affairs. ]

[Choo Kyung-ho / Floor Leader of People's Power: (Representative Han Dong-hoon said we should appoint a special inspector) I will not tell you anymore. No comment.]

[Anchor]
The party leader represents the party legally and externally and is in charge of party affairs. CEO Han Dong-hoon said this. Floor leader Choo Kyung-ho said he would not comment on the matter, but the special inspector card is only increasing the conflict between the close and pro-Yoon-gye. How do you each have a different position?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
The fact that the special inspector is mentioned is in the end related to the so-called Kim Gun-hee suspicion. We have to look at the context. There was a lot of talk about the installation of the special inspector and the second annex. We talked about it to solve the problem of Mrs. Kim. Speaking of the special prosecutor's office, the second annex. The reason why this came out suddenly came out when the special prosecutor's story died down.

The special inspector was a system agreed upon by the ruling and opposition parties in June 2014, during the Park Geun Hye administration. At that time, Special Inspector Lee Seok-soo resigned over the inspection of the Office of the Senior Secretary for Civil Affairs. And it hasn't been appointed yet. It was the same during the Moon Jae In administration and the Yoon Suk Yeol administration. In fact, this is not a matter of dispute between the floor leader and the representative for the special inspector.

I'm talking about my work area, but it's difficult to divide it into work areas. As Han Dong-hoon said, the representative represents the party legally and externally. And floor negotiations and things like that are done by the floor leader. The floor leader is also elected, so he's not the floor leader. The so-called two-top in the party is called the representative and floor leader.

That's why floor leader Choo Kyung-ho is protesting, but if you look at this, you wouldn't say this if the so-called president and the ruling party leader did not collide. What kind of floor leader would say that this is my authority just because the party leader said this?

In context, this phenomenon came as the president's office and representative Han Dong-hoon clashed over various issues such as the issue of First Lady Kim Gun-hee. And I'll talk to you from now on.The introduction of a special inspector does not solve the problem. The special inspector does not have the right to investigate or investigate.

I'm asking the prosecution to investigate. The prosecution has already dismissed the suspicion of accepting the luxury bag case and the Deutsche Motors stock price manipulation case. Even if this special inspector is appointed, it will be difficult for the ruling and opposition parties to agree and be appointed. Even if the ruling party recommends it, it won't be easy to appoint. Even so, will the special inspector request the prosecution to investigate various allegations of Kim Gun-hee in the past?

Because I think it is unlikely, it causes unnecessary discord within the ruling party. It's not very profitable, that's what I see. I think the floor leader is trying to block this excessively.

[Anchor]
The special inspector itself means that he will stop his stomach in advance. And it's completely different from the special prosecutor. Why did CEO Han Dong-hoon bring this special inspector card?

[Park Sang Kyu]
So if the current crisis is to soften and dispel the growing critical public opinion about Kim Gun-hee, the ruling camp should be the way to get out of the crisis and restore the Yoon Suk Yeol president's momentum for state affairs. That's why the special inspector sees it as the minimum condition. I'm not saying that this can all be done.

That's why the internal strife within the party erupted yesterday, so on the 26th. This day marked the 45th anniversary of the death of former President Park Chung-hee, and there was a memorial service to commemorate the 45th anniversary of the death of former President Park Chung-hee. Representative Han Dong-hoon went down to attend, and floor leader Choo Kyung-ho also attended, but there was a small happening.

Park Geun-young delivered a eulogy as a representative of the bereaved family, and the people who attended in front of him are called out all the time. I understood all the time in front of me, but CEO Han Dong-hoon was sitting there, but CEO Han Dong-hoon was passed. So I said CEO Choo Kyung-ho. So the audience was surprised. Why didn't you call the leader of the ruling party when he was here? It's weird. Usually, it is also called CEO Choo Kyung-ho outside.

But it was kind of weird to call the floor leader the representative when there was a representative. So I asked later. What just happened here? That's why it's a mistake. But you can see it in two ways. One is Park Geun-young read the manuscript. Isn't it asking if you didn't read it because it wasn't in the manuscript? There were two things that were possible.

I don't know the truth. But the phenomenal thing is that. So why didn't the surprised people call Han Dong-hoon's name? It's a mistake to say this. It's a simple mistake. And I like CEO Han Dong-hoon. I've cleaned up like this. The viewers need to know this atmosphere. Then there was the speech.

CEO Han Dong-hoon talked about change and innovation. The special inspector's Tig also didn't come out. Actually, it wasn't even a place to be. And after the meeting, reporters ran to floor leader Choo Kyung-ho and asked questions. Floor leader Choo Kyung-ho also only talked about the unity and unity of the party.

What does this mean, the remarks of the Supreme Council meeting that we saw earlier on this issue, the answer in Gwanghwamun. I won't comment. Something is going to make progress, but as it was reported in the media, it went into a state of expansion. The burden came from the passport. The presidential office and the ruling party.

Who would like this material? It's not desirable to keep spreading this, the party elders have come forward. So, if we read yesterday's October 26 meeting as I said, did we start coordinating behind the scenes while refraining from the remarks? We didn't have to fight among ourselves. We went in this atmosphere. One important point here is whether or not to argue.

Is this a party line or not? Therefore, the pro-Yoon-gye's position is that the Democratic Party of Korea should link the appointment of directors of the North Korean Human Rights Foundation. It's not related to that, it's the position of the friendly community. This is the key part. But this comment came out. It's not a party line, is it? Is it a party theory or not? You can see them fighting.

Who wants this part to get bigger? It's a problem to think about because it's the Democratic Party that likes to expand on this. It's Sunday, and we'll have to talk all day today and see how the remarks come out at the Supreme Council meeting on Monday.

[Anchor]
Then, I think the party's theory or not is an important part. Then, what do you think about the possibility of going to a vote at the general meeting of lawmakers after the parliamentary audit?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
I don't think we're going to vote. It's in the subtitles before. Isn't there a side that wins and a side that loses? Even the issue of the special inspector will have no place for the power of the people if the power of the people is rejected. I am pushing for this in the power of the people at the very least, the minimum measures related to the controversy related to Mrs. Kim Gun-hee and the resolution of various suspicions.

As critic Park Sang-gyu said earlier. What if we vote on this? There's a confrontation structure between Chin-yoon and Chin-han, but it completely split up around the special inspector. In this regard, floor leader Choo Kyung-ho should not take the position of unduly siding with the presidential office, but at least a special inspector. As I said earlier, it doesn't mean that a special inspector will be introduced at all.

That doesn't mean that the special prosecutor will disappear at all. The Democratic Party of Korea has proposed a third special prosecutor, Kim Gun-hee. Then, the ruling and opposition parties agree on a special inspector and recommend three people to the president.
Does that make sense? It's not like that. Nevertheless, since we talked about it, we have to accept this.

Even though this issue does not solve the problem at all, even this issue does reject the special inspector, by opening a protocol? So the passport will have almost no foundation. Since the public sentiment will be divided, we should agree on this somehow and say that we have overturned the special inspector within the party. Nevertheless, since we talked about it, it is right to accept it. Floor leader Choo Kyung-ho's doing this is never helping the president.

Only the president's position will become more ambiguous, and of course, President Yoon Suk Yeol will be negative about the introduction of a special inspector and special inspector. It looks like that to me. Even the special inspector seems to deny this when the public opinion is quite bad even though the floor leader has come forward? The term of office ends on November 12th, when Chin-yoon and Chin-yoon come to an end.

Then power goes downhill. Can Chin Yoon exist then? Chin-yoon is not a comrade with specific values like YS, DJ, Kim Young-sam, and Kim Dae Jung in the past. That's the same for the Democrats. But Chin-yoon, how can you be close? Shouldn't we look at the public opinion?

Is it time to say no and no comment with a special inspector? This is not the time for me to argue with my work area, which makes no sense.

[Anchor]
After looking at the public opinion, he said that he should at least get a special inspector. However, there is a huge disagreement between Chin-yoon and her close friends over the special inspector. I wonder what neutral MPs are like, what do you think?

[Park Sang Kyu]
If you look at the media reports, you're talking about numbers again. I'm going to hold a general meeting of the members, but I think the general meeting of the members is visible anyway. This is because representative Han Dong-hoon's position is to submit this to the opinion poll of all party members, but it takes time and it's not a simple matter. So, in the pro-yoon community, there is a general meeting of lawmakers, so why would they do that?

We also need to coordinate this. CEO Han Dong-hoon should refrain, too. Because there's nothing to like. The Democratic Party has already announced that it will be on the streets on October 2nd wearing a long padded jacket. The long padded jacket is for winter. He's saying he's going to keep going.

If so, CEO Han Dong-hoon came to the 100th day of his inauguration, and CEO Han Dong-hoon also came to the third of his term.
is two thirds away. The first half of Yoon Suk Yeol's inauguration is on November 10. November is a huge month. Four days later, Kim Hye-kyung, and one day later, CEO Lee Jae-myung's first trial. It's a row. There's an incredible November coming.

Prior to this, I don't think the ruling party will continue to fight over this. So, of course, this will be mentioned at the press conference on the 100th day of his inauguration. I'm sure the reporters will have the most questions about this story. We have to come up with a solution in some way, but what would the supporters of the ruling camp say when the gun of the attack continues to turn toward Yongsan?


I'm using the expression 'I'm sick of it' in a bad way. Until when we turn on the TV and open YouTube, do we have to watch the fight? I think the ruling party's supporters are on the verge of such an explosion. Therefore, it is necessary to find a solution both politically and from the people's point of view.

Then politics is said to be the art of consensus. It's the art of negotiation. So let's vote this through compromise without offering any suggestion. According to what I said earlier, there are about 20 close relationships. 22 people gathered to eat. Among them, there are 12 to 13 gold badges. And I see 30 to 40 pro-Yoon-gye.

Then about 50 people in the constituency of the seats are wait-and-see, centrist. Young people such as Rep. Kim Jae-seop and Rep. Kim Yong-tae did not go to the dinner that day. Is this person Chin Yoon? That's not right. About 50 decisive casting vote-takers are watching this situation, even within the ruling party. Therefore, I think we should recognize that voting competition is the way to collapse together and collapse together, as Professor Choi said.

[Anchor]
As you said, representative Han is set to hold a press conference on Wednesday. Do you think we will continue to make remarks that increase the level of pressure on President Yoon and his wife?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
It's not easy to predict. I think I'm going to raise the pressure level. It came out on the screen earlier. The president, the leader of the ruling party, and the chief of staff sitting down. That's a very awkward scene. I've already done that, so the president, this is my guess. I don't think the president wants to acknowledge the ruling party leader. Han Dong-hoon, the leader of the ruling party, is already saying everything the president has to say. It's a situation where you keep raising the water level.

We even brought up the special inspector. Under this circumstance, will he suddenly appear subdued at the 100th day of his inauguration press conference? I don't think so. And last time, we talked about recommending a third party to the Marine Corps Special Prosecutor. That's pretty much gone now. And then I had a lot of criticism about Han.

And then the conflict comes up again. I think like this. If the ruling party goes like this, it cannot be solved only when this problem is solved. And some sacrifices are needed to solve some problems. There are so many issues related to First Lady Kim Gun-hee that we can't go completely as if nothing is happening. You need to look at it objectively.

Regardless of the ruling and opposition parties' positions, I'm asking if Kim Gun-hee can go completely without any problems. It wouldn't have been this problem if it was
. Didn't the first lady Kim Gun-hee's question start to come out during the last presidential election? I apologized during the presidential election. It keeps coming out, but eventually, it began to come out through the story of a so-called political broker named Myung Tae-kyun. In this situation, the president has to make a decision.

Should the floor leader and the representative hold a meeting with a special inspector? This is a very secondary issue. The essence is that the president makes a decision and the people change now. Now, if you finally change, all problems can be solved. But some sacrifices are needed.

Warring, is there a war where you win without injuring any of your body? This isn't the problem anyway, is it? They don't look at the essence and keep saying that they are close to each other in the passport. Of course, it's inevitable politically.Ma has a completely different nature now, but he's talking about everything differently. That's why my approval rating keeps falling. That's not the essence, is it?

I'm sure you all know that. There's no way you don't know. Let's go back to reality. I don't know if we're going to vote at the general meeting or not.I think Ma is more likely to go closer. People in the middle are supposed to follow the public opinion. In any case, it is my argument that the president should avoid parliamentary elections and make a decision that is forward-looking, groundbreaking, and includes change and reform.

[Park Sang Kyu]
I'd like to say something about senior players' mouth wrestling, but it's Daegu Market in Hong Joon Pyo, and there's a very important expression even though it didn't come out in the graphic. It's like a handful of lemmings. What's lemming? It's a wild mouse living in North America, but it's a wanderer mouse. It has three characteristics. It's a terrible nearsightedness. I can hardly see. Just looking at the narrow streets.

The second is the instinct to go straight. And he falls and dies while following the back. But scholars call this some kind of suicide. What kind of suicide do rats commit? I mistakenly thought it was suicide to fall down a cliff while chasing someone just looking at the tail in front of me. And they said it was a childish rampage.

CEO Han Dong-hoon is 54 years old this year. Even though the 54-year-old is his junior in the prosecution, I don't know why he's making such a fuss about the ruling party leader of a country. When two anchors think about immature children, teenagers or younger are usually called immature children. over-expression I don't know who this is going to help with

So you have to give advice or discipline in a dignified manner. Laming of the week, Zoom expressed the laming as a handful. But if there are a lot of lemmings, there are thousands of them. The metaphor of the expression itself is wrong.

And do you have to compare it to a living thing or a beautiful thing and attack it? From this point of view, senior members of the ruling and opposition parties, especially senior members of the ruling party, should empower the president and cheer for the leader of the ruling party. This is more than disrespect and ridicule. I want you to refrain from doing that.

[Anchor]
It seems to be an indicator of how serious the conflict within the party is. I think we need to see how to solve it. Even just by looking at the approval rating, the conflict within the party is revealed. Let's look at the approval rating. President Yoon Suk Yeol's approval rating is at its lowest since taking office, and Kim Gun-hee was the problem when she ranked first in the negative evaluation. How will the president's office accept this kind of public opinion?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
It was 22% in the previous week. And last week was the Gallup survey. That was 20%, and the approval rating for the state administration was. However, last week, the first reason for negative evaluation was the economy and people's livelihood. However, last week, the first place with 20% was the factor of Kim Gun-hee. There's a factor in the negative evaluation. Even if the presidential office is only 1 percentage point, it should be taken seriously.

A lot of people are talking about this.Why is the public opinion so bad? And since he took office, there has been no president who has not been able to escape the stagnation of his approval rating like this, and there has been no president since democratization. At the end of his term, there was always a lame duck because it was a plant regime. Everyone left the party. Only Moon Jae In and Lee Myung Bak did not leave the party. After democratization. It's a situation like that, but it's a situation like this since the beginning of the term, and then it's like this because it's in the middle of the term.

Then we have to see why this is like that. Someone said this. The person who appeared on the show with me was caused by fake news and agitation that public opinion deteriorated. But it's hard to agree with them because it can temporarily deceive so many people. And you can distort a small number of people for a long time, but you can't deceive a large number of people for a long time.

It's called public sentiment. During the Joseon Dynasty and Goryeo Dynasty, there was a public sentiment. Did you do the poll then? Do you have SNS? Do you have a cell phone? Isn't there a flow of public sentiment then, too? But how can you say that like that?

I'm not saying that I'm talking about a specific person, but I wonder if the ruling party sees it like that in the presidential office. Public sentiment is aggravated by the left's agitation by fake news or agitation. This is going to change. In addition, I think it is a big mistake to think that the first trial of representative Lee Jae-myung will change when the results come out because it is on November 15th and 20th.

[Park Sang-gyu]
The famous words that Professor Choi Chang-ryul said were those of U.S. President Lincoln. All political students know this. Polls should not be blind, but they should not be overlooked or belittled. Moreover, Korea Gallup is usually a place that accepts it objectively, regardless of whether it is right or left.

That's why YTN is also presented graphically like that. You have to look closely at the part where public opinion in Daegu, called the heart of conservatism and engine, has fallen. Also, 26 and 27% for Boolean Gyeong. It's way down from the Democratic Party. When he was elected president of Yoon Suk Yeol in the past, it is impossible to compare with public opinion. You have to look at this carefully.

Paying attention to the public opinion related to Mrs. Kim Gun-hee earlier, it was only about 3% in the second week of September. So it's only about 3% for the president's negative evaluation. This is about a month ago. But this jumps to 6%. So, the number was small, but it doubled. I didn't watch it seriously until then.

But it came over to October, and it became 14% and 15% again. From the perspective of those who are watching this, it's a very nervous figure. Anyway, floor leader Choo Kyung-ho's tone down or Yongsan said that. It was immediately said that he was looking at this public opinion seriously. It's because of the Gallup poll.

I'm saying that I can't help but value this part. So I will do my best to read the public sentiment and respond accordingly. Of course, there was a sense of crisis in the passport. It's chilling.

The reason is that there is no big election, but public sentiment toward the election accumulates. It builds up in the body with Sinab, and heavy metals are scary. You shouldn't let it pile up like that. So, as I said earlier, to go back to square one, it's not the time to fight like this with a sense of privilege.

The opposition party talks about the special prosecutor rather than the special prosecutor. Why didn't the Central District Prosecutors' Office investigate the case after talking about the independent counsel? Park Eun-jung, a member of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, did so at the Judiciary Committee's parliamentary inspection. So, Attorney General Park Sung-jae gave a very good answer. What did you say? You hate the center so much, but why do you ask me to send it to the center again? They say they will impeach the chief of the Central District Prosecutors' Office and cannot investigate the case, but why are they sending the case of Myeong Tae-kyun to the Central District Prosecutors' Office?

And isn't it because all the data on the Myung-tae bacillus case have been told? The Changwon District Prosecutors' Office is investigating now, so let's wait and see. Why do you like the center so much? I introduced this remark because the bigger perfect storm is actually the special counsel behind the special inspector.

With the Democratic Party's outdoor rally on October 2nd, the wave of the special prosecution is showing signs of a tremendous concentration. This is not the time for the ruling party to say, "Is your stomach big or mine big?" You have to tie your stomach to break through this. That's what I'm saying.

[Anchor]
In terms of party support, the power of the people increased by about 2 percentage points from the previous week. As you said, the special prosecutor and special prosecutor were mentioned, and in the end, President Yoon's approval rating and the people's power approval rating were different. Do you think the conflict between representative Han Dong-hoon and Yongsan may have affected it?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
But I don't think there's anything that the people's power will like. I don't think that's a very important point. Anyway, the people's power increased while falling together, but the support of political parties increased. That's probably the case. It seems that the party leader has risen because he talks a lot that matches public opinion while setting an angle with the president. We've talked enough so far.Ma's party is also divided between pro-yoon and close friends, so this is not even a conflict between the party and the government.

as the party is divided Representative Han Dong-hoon and representative Han Dong-hoon are on the same side, and the presidential office and Chin-yoon are on the same side. I think the party-government conflict is wrong, and nevertheless, the party's rise seems to have rebounded because the party leader said such bitter things and talked about the special inspector. I don't think it means much.

[Anchor]
Earlier, the critic said that the independent counsel is a perfect storm, but the Democratic Party seems to expect the conflict within the ruling party to reflect on the benefits. Kim's independent counsel bill will be submitted to the plenary session next month and a re-vote will be held within this year. Looking at the situation within the party of people's power, the internal conflict has intensified, so the departure vote may come out differently than before, what do you think?

[Park Sang Kyu]
So there's a premise. There is a premise that if this cannot be resolved smoothly within the ruling party. I have time. Looking at it now, I think it will go until early December as you said. In early December, there is a river called November. November is still a long time. So, can the ruling party remove the precondition within this month? If we fight like this, there is a premise that if we can't find a solution like this.

[Anchor]
Do you think it will be sutured?

[Park Sang Kyu]
You have to say it upside down. As I said earlier, politics is not just a thing, but negotiations. We need to find a solution. Finding a solution requires putting your heads together and not blushing at each other. So we have to acknowledge each other. Han Dong-hoon, an out-of-house representative, should also listen to the words of pro-Yoon-gye, the majority of seats in the floor. If we have a

vote, we won't win if we compete with political reporters. So Professor Choi said that the middle position is important, but the middle position follows the public sentiment, and public sentiment will continue to come out several times before the vote in November. Of course, like that graphic, there is a river of judicial risk that representative Lee Jae-myung should cross.

Kim Hye-kyung on the 14th, herself on the 15th, and herself on the 25th. As you do this, the polls will continue to be conducted and the results of the judgment will come out. This is not a hurdle that the Democratic Party can simply overcome. It's a hurdle that Woo Sang-hyuk can trip over like he's tripping over. The bigger the voice that you don't trip, the greater the concern that you can trip. So I don't know. It's a composite variable.

They say the U.S. presidential election is a difference of perilla leaves, which Americans don't even eat. That's why no one knows. The political premise of leaving this alone is meaningless. I'm telling you that we have to solve it within a month.

[Anchor]
At the same time, there is an off-the-shelf public opinion contest, and the Democratic Party is preparing for a pan-national convention to condemn Kim on the 2nd. The cause is aimed at President Yoon and his wife, but what do you think of the intention to turn your attention to Lee's judicial risks and attack the ruling party, as you said?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
If the ruling party shows a mess like that, judicial risks will be covered by themselves. I think the court also has the potential to involve political judgment. No AI judges just because it's a court. The politicization of justice in our country has been a long time. Of course, even if the Supreme Court has been more conservative than in the past or during the Moon Jae In regime, the Supreme Court's ruling can be delayed.

So if the support of the ruling party goes up and the people start to support the change and reform of the ruling party and various issues, the court can also make a ruling before the presidential election, to the Supreme Court. No matter how much the first trial ruling comes out or more than 1 million won, it will not be shaken because it is the first trial.

Even if there are some agitation within the opposition party, Lee Jae-myung will not be shaken. However, the Supreme Court can delay its judgment if the ruling party continues to self-destruct in this way and does not receive public support. That's why judicial risks can be covered by themselves.

And the Democratic Party is digging into that gap. Then, as you said earlier, depending on how the ruling party changes, if the special inspection is introduced, there will be a justification for ruling party lawmakers to reject the special inspection. When the president vetoed and returned to the National Assembly. However, if there is no special inspector, there is no such thing as yuyamu.

Like a third-party special counsel's recommendation. Then, I think there will be a lot of leave votes within the ruling party. I can't do this anymore. The ruling party members are also members of the National Assembly. They're following the public sentiment. Then there won't be a lot of leave votes. We got four votes last time.

Then, if you can't be a special inspector, Yongsan will continue to work hard again. Then, there could be a surprisingly large number of opposition votes from ruling party lawmakers. I don't know why you don't know that. Even people like me know it.

[Anchor]
Representative Han Dong-hoon accepted Lee Jae-myung's meeting on the 21st. What kind of political intention do you think the two representatives agreed to meet each other at this point? What do you think they have?

[Park Sang Kyu]
In fact, this was the most decisive story that made the Yongsan meeting like the North Pole because it was almost cold. Chief of Staff Park Jung-ha announced this three hours before the meeting. But this was originally talked about, but it was a kind of bait thrown by the Democratic Party. CEO Han Dong-hoon bit this.

So, in my opinion, it wasn't something to announce three hours before the meeting. There were talks about meeting with President Yoon because this was not a sudden variable, but he gave it to her three hours before the meeting with President Yoon, and Park Jung-ha, the chief of staff, said he would come to meet me by announcing it, so did he announce the meeting with the opposition leader first? So, there are evaluations that the anxious meeting has simply fallen into the abyss.

There is nothing urgent about this meeting itself from both sides. Since the Democratic Party of Korea is facing a judicial risk, there will be no results at this meeting, and representative Han Dong-hoon has experienced such negative public opinion with his body, but it is not necessary to meet with representative Lee Jae-myung first. You have to solve your family's problems first and meet them even if you meet them.

[Anchor]
What do you think is the reason why CEO Han Dong-hoon received it?

[Park Sang Kyu]
So when I asked him to meet me, I thought that if I put pressure like this, President Yoon would meet me and listen to my position, but I think that was a little thin. That's why he didn't read President Yoon's usual temperament well. The more you do that, the more President Yoon is not the kind of person who will listen to it and accept it. So rather, it was this announcement that shook hands.

I think this meeting will be postponed. It's not urgent right now, so it's difficult to do this, and it's the result of pouring oil into the fire, so I think there's no big place in this meeting. Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the Democratic Party, is said to be meeting with former lawmakers Lee Sang-don, Kim Jong-in, and Yoon Yeo-jun, who are now senior citizens. It has features.

These are all seniors of B-Yoon and Ban-Yoon. So the reason we meet is that I keep thinking that this is also a kind of play.

[Anchor]
Lastly, the professor said that the meeting between the two representatives is not urgent, but there is a sentence for Lee Jae-myung on the 15th. If you are found guilty at that time, isn't it difficult to meet the two representatives at all?

[Choi Chang Ryul]
It's different what kind of sentence you get for being guilty. Whether the Public Official Election Act is more than 1 million won or less is a difference between heaven and earth. I think we'll meet. As representative Han Dong-hoon, there is room for it to be interpreted as pressure on the president, and the special prosecutor cannot be bypassed. It is proposed and passed, and the right to request reconsideration by the president is exercised, and re-vote, this is not possible.

How long can I refuse it because it's in the procedures? So, we met and Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the party, conceded, and the ruling party will have a justification for what the ruling party says is a toxic clause, except for the toxic clause. I think that's the only way. Is there a way for the passport to avoid this, no matter how much I look at it, the special prosecutor? I don't think it's going to be easy for me.

In that sense, wouldn't it be right to meet and coordinate? I think we'll meet. I don't think we'll even meet right away, even when I see it. However, I think there is enough opportunity for a meeting.

[Anchor]
So far, we have comprehensively investigated the conflict between close friends and pro-Yoon-gye and the political circles. So far, I have talked with Choi Chang-ryul, a special professor at Yongin University, and Park Sang-gyu, a current affairs critic. Thank you.