President Yoon's 'Second Arrest Warrant' is about to be executed...Will "Tactics of the People" work?

■ Host: Anchor Kim Jung-jin, Anchor Jung Chae-woon
■ Starring: Lawyer Sohn Soo-ho

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN Newswide] when quoting.

[Anchor]
The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police are preparing to execute the second arrest warrant for President Yoon.

[Anchor]
Park Jong-joon, the former chief of security who is suspected of obstructing the execution of the arrest warrant, appeared again to the police today following yesterday.

Let's take a look at the investigation into the emergency martial law incident, legal issues related to the impeachment trial, and lawyer Sohn So-ho. Welcome.

[Anchor]
First, let's look at the story of Park Jong-joon, the former chief of security. I returned home after more than 13 hours of investigation, and a little while ago, it was reported that I attended the police for a second investigation today. What do you think the police will continue their investigation by focusing on the allegations they are facing and what points?

[Sonho]
The execution of the first arrest warrant against the president is blocked. It was immediately booked at that time. He is a suspect in obstruction of the execution of special public affairs. Basically, it seems that there will be enough questions and answers about the suspected facts in yesterday's investigation and today's investigation. That would be the basis. In other words, it will be the most basic to question whether former Minister Park Jong-joon interfered with the execution of special public affairs. However, from the investigative agency's point of view, there will be quite a lot of information that I want to get from former Chief Park Jong-joon.

In other words, with the execution of a second arrest warrant for the president imminent, the current situation in the residence, the status of the security personnel, and the police and military forces from the first execution to the present.
And there's a security guard. You probably want to ask and hear comprehensive stories, such as what the relationship is like between them. And because there was some cooperation in that respect, I think I returned home yesterday and continued the investigation right away today.

[Anchor]
Didn't you lose your current status for now because you submitted your resignation and attended the police? How do you think this will affect you?

[Sonho]
This part is also meaningful. Because you attended yesterday in response to your attendance request. First of all, I attended and was investigated, and I also conducted a late-night survey. If you were a current position, you will return to your job. If so, it could again serve as a deterrent to the execution of arrest warrants in the official residence. And as the head of the highest-ranking bodyguard. If so, it would not have been easy for the police to release the recruits without securing them after yesterday's investigation.

However, since he attended voluntarily yesterday and is not currently in the office, the need to secure recruits seems to have fallen further. Also, the fact that you were not in the current position in the first place was that you submitted your resignation. The act of submitting such a resignation letter itself will cooperate with the investigation, and I will tell you a large part of what has happened. In addition, I think behind-the-scenes negotiations or negotiations yesterday that could provide various information on the execution of arrest warrants were conducted.

[Anchor]
Former Chief Park Jong-joon was absent in the first and second rounds, and there was also talk that he could not appear in the third summons, but he changed his mind and attended yesterday and again today. Then, what kind of background do you think it's in response to your request?

[Sonho]
I was actually surprised. I didn't respond to the continuous request for attendance, but I was surprised to hear that you suddenly responded like this. I didn't expect that at all. Not only me but also the police seem to have not predicted it. So when I came out for investigation yesterday, the police were very busy preparing for the investigation. It was an unexpected attendance. And in addition to this, I can guess that there must have been a lot of work inside the security service and in relation to the president without our knowledge about the fact that he submitted his resignation and was processed immediately. First of all, I think there are various possibilities for the reason why former Chief Park Jong-joon attended yesterday. The first thing is to make it public. Even in front of reporters yesterday, he was busy with his work, so he couldn't attend. In addition, he said that he had to appoint an attorney, but he was not appointed as a lawyer, so he came out as soon as he was appointed. He strongly expressed his position that there is no problem with not attending because he did not come out on purpose, but because he came out following normal procedures. In light of this, externally yes.I think there are many possibilities behind the dryness.

The first one came out to prevent physical collisions because it was really concerning. Or they came out to avoid it because there is a risk of punishment. Also, this will be a little more speculative, but there was a kind of power game within the security office, and according to the rank, the chief is the highest, right? However, according to some reports, he was eventually pushed out by other deputy directors known as heavyweights. There is also something noteworthy about what former Chief Park Jong-joon revealed. I made a statement to the effect that I have made various mediation efforts. Therefore, a warrant has been issued, but it is not good to be executed in its current form. At the same time, he suggested various arbitration proposals, including investigations, at the third place, but he said that no such arbitration efforts were made. Then, did the president really see such mediation efforts positively? I don't think so. If so, former Minister Park's efforts rather made the president lose confidence. So we can't rule out the possibility that it wasn't actually a voluntary resignation and investigation, but it was kind of a form of ouster after all. But there's also an analysis that's the opposite of what I've said so far. In other words, it confused the police investigation and paved the way for those with stronger positions within the security service to direct the command without going through the chief. There is also an interpretation that it is rather out of the way, but I personally do not agree with that interpretation. In the end, it is very important that former Chief Park came to the police yesterday. From the police's point of view, it seems that they have received a lot of information from yesterday to today due to various concerns.

[Anchor]
Former Chief Park Jong-joon made this comment yesterday when he attended the police. "The current method of executing arrest warrants is not possible. He mentioned that the investigation process should be carried out appropriate to the current presidential status, but in the end, should it be considered that he made this claim that the warrant is not legally correct? How did you see it?

[Sonho]
I think you pointed out a very important part. The position of the presidential lawyers seen so far and the position of the former Minister Park yesterday seem similar, but I think it's quite different. Because the request and issuance of arrest warrants are legally wrong, that is, they can be followed because they are invalid and illegal, is the position of President Yoon and his lawyers. And when the former director Park made a statement a few days ago, he also said that. However, yesterday, in front of the reporters, he emphasized the reference of procedural rather than legal judgment or invalidity. In other words, on the premise that a warrant is issued, such an arrest warrant itself does not fit the national prestige. This is not a legal story.

In addition, the investigation process should be carried out in accordance with the current presidential status. Therefore, although a warrant has been issued, it is read to the effect that mobilizing physical force for execution with it is not polite to the president. In this way, I pointed out the method, procedure, and form of execution of arrest warrants. If so, it is slightly different from the criticism of the president's effectiveness so far. So far, I have not responded to the request for attendance and I also felt a little bit like drawing a line, saying that what I blocked from executing the first warrant was pointing out the problem of formality rather than dissatisfaction with the overall judicial system.

[Anchor]
I lost my current status when I resigned. Kim Sung-hoon, deputy chief of security, will now take over as acting chief. Deputy Director Kim Sung-hoon is known as a hardliner, so should I say that the ironclad security strategy becomes stronger?

[Sonho]
That seems highly likely. First of all, Deputy Manager Kim has been reported on his relationship with the first lady. I didn't check it myself, but it's been reported a lot, and it won't be easy to suddenly change the route here under the current situation. He also reportedly spearheaded preparations to block the execution of the first warrant, and I don't know if he was willing to speak to the media when rumors of President Yoon's escape emerged.You got a picture of your hair. Even then, there were media reports that he knew about it before the security chief and prepared various things there. If true, it seems difficult to make any judgments and various choices like former Chief Park. If so, you can think that eventually the president's fate and his own legal fate will be intertwined.

In addition, we share many values and agree on the background of the emergency declaration made by President Yoon Suk Yeol in the first place and the idea that it was inevitable before making practical and practical judgments. If so, it seems likely to eventually block the execution of an arrest warrant against the president under any circumstances because it is based on one's own beliefs. However, there are variables. Because the head of the security department left. That's why, in practice, Deputy Chief Lee can conduct the command.Will Ma be able to pour as well as before inside? In this regard, I think the Presidential Security Service may have various concerns.

[Anchor]
However, at 10 a.m. today, Deputy Chief Kim Sung-hoon was notified of the third summons. It's 10:27 now, so it's been about 30 minutes and I can assume it's not responding, so isn't there a possibility of an emergency arrest?

[Sonho]
As we expected, Kim Sung-hoon probably won't respond to the request for attendance. And the situation is different from that of the former director Park, because one is currently employed and one is a former employee. Whether you're being investigated while you're in the office, or are you being investigated while you're changing jobs? What's quite different about this is that if you change jobs, you don't return to work. However, in the case of the incumbent, even if they are investigated in response to the request for attendance, they will return if they are released after the investigation. That's why various emergency arrests can be made to prevent such a thing, but the current situation is that you don't respond to the five points of attendance. I don't think I'll respond in the future. If so, it seems more likely to seek an arrest warrant rather than an emergency arrest and try to execute it after obtaining the warrant.

In addition, not only Deputy Director Kim Sung-hoon, but also Director Lee Kwang-woo and Director of Security and Safety Headquarters continue to not attend. They also seem to be in a different situation from former director Park. It appears that he will not continue to attend. It seems quite likely that arrest warrants will continue to be requested and issued sequentially. Also, the police and the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit want to execute arrest warrants for working-level officials issued like this and ultimately secure the arrest of the president. Therefore, it can be done simultaneously with the execution of the president, but strategically, if an arrest warrant is issued first, it is an assumption. If an arrest warrant is issued, I think it is necessary to consider executing an arrest warrant for them first.

[Anchor]
The timing of the second round of execution against President Yoon is also of interest. It's not officially confirmed, but if you look at the results of a number of reports now, it's expected to be about two weeks and it's been talked about for about three weeks. So, as far as I know, it's usually about a week, but should I look at it as a pretty long period? What do you think?

[Sonho]
That's right. According to the relevant regulations, it is a rule to make it 7 days of validity.Ma, but depending on the situation, it can be longer than that. So there are quite a few cases where arrest warrants are issued.In some cases, it's very long. It comes out even if you're wanted. But the second arrest warrant for the president is known to have a longer validity than the first. But don't I deal with many criminal cases myself while working? So I was quite at the scene of the warrant execution, but I've never been at the scene of the arrest warrant execution. Because you have to think about the purpose of the arrest warrant. The arrest warrant is not an arrest, an indictment, a trial, or a conviction. I want to call him and listen to him, but he doesn't come out, so it's all about bringing him. In the case of the president, if that happens, it will eventually lead to arrest and eventually lead to prosecution and trial, so it is prevented from the first step because I think that heavy punishment cannot be avoided.

Anyway, the reason I haven't been able to see this arrest warrant at the execution site is because the arrest warrant is to bring someone who does not respond to the investigation. In other words, I requested an arrest warrant. I got it issued. When is this until? I'm leaving. I've never seen an arrest warrant that says and executes it like this. It's against the purpose in the first place. So, of course, because it's about the president, there are many specialities and the situation that I've never seen before continues. Another thing I want to point out is the kind of naivety of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. I was very naive. In other words, the National Assembly said this after failing to execute the first arrest warrant. I knew the president would cooperate. I didn't know the president wouldn't come out until the end. But isn't it something that everyone guessed? You should have guessed the possibility. But looking at this, I think it was because the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit announced the expiration date and reported that it would be executed sometime before then, and these things were not well understood by the president's personality. That's why even the usual issuance of arrest warrants, claims, claims, and enforcement of other presidents can be a form of courtesy. However, as a result, it failed and led to strong criticism of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, and the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit apologized to the people, and as a result, it seems to be a very confusing situation that is currently leading to a considerable crisis of the rule of law.

[Anchor]
From the point of view of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, this was the key to when and how to execute the arrest warrant. However, there were talks about mobilizing 1,000 investigators, and there were also talks about investigators who have been tracking gang members and drug offenders. So what role do these officers play when an arrest warrant is executed?

[Sonho]
I contacted the police and they were very busy. It's quite busy, and some say why do we have to do this? Or, some complained that it was already a political conflict issue, but whether it was right to be this active.Overall, Ma showed a lot of willingness in terms of solving the situation quickly rather than such complaints and that our police should do what no one can do. However, in this situation, it is the remarks in the National Assembly that can eventually get a hint. There were questions about urgent issues in the National Assembly, and lawmakers asked about this. There has been confusion over the question of how to divide the roles when executing the second warrant in the future. The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit entrusted the police with the execution of the warrant, but withdrew it after being pointed out that there was a legal problem.

Then, in the current situation, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit is leading the way. Of course, there will be some resistance from the police to the statement of conducting.The Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit will lead the way, and the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit will take the lead in issuing warrants and arresting them. However, even if the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit can and should do it, it is impossible to do only the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit. It's because I'm currently using my physical strength to block it. As a result, the National Assembly's pending questions suggested that the police would take the lead in such tasks as neutralizing and eliminating obstruction of illegal resistance to the execution of legally issued warrants.

[Anchor]
Even at the time of the first execution, there were various issues that were blocked by more than 200 security personnel. That's why I think you're in a position to mobilize on a large scale this time, what do you think?

[Sonho]
As you said earlier, as the national script was newly created, there are various regulations that are quite procedural enough to hear the expression "police within the police." I sent an official letter to the four police agencies in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi-do and said that I would mobilize all of my manpower. Therefore, it seems that a significant number of people are currently ready. I think there is virtually no possibility that the president will respond to the request for attendance under the current situation. I think we can rule it out. If so, I personally think that paradoxically, in order to avoid unfortunate situations when you have to give up the execution of the warrant or start executing the warrant, it would be rather positive to minimize resistance or backlash while showing a fairly overwhelming appearance.

[Anchor]
Lawyer, we continue to report this time, but there is news that the execution of the second arrest warrant is imminent. There are talks about this weekend right now, but there are also talks that it will be the beginning of the week. It's hard to predict, but what do you think, lawyer?

[Sonho]
It's really hard to predict. I don't know either. From this point of view, I don't think I know the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police don't. Even if the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit and the police have planned to some extent, it is a very important security matter. At the time of execution of the first warrant, it was virtually possible to guess to some extent, and there was also an aspect of showing it to everyone. You failed as a result. So it seems like you have a lot of worries right now. However, I don't think I'm going to execute the warrant right now. Because yesterday, Chief Park Jong-joon responded to the request for attendance and left his seat and is still responding to the investigation today.

If so, it seems that not only the investigation into the former director Park's allegations, but also various preparations for other parts will be made. In addition to the preparation work, no matter what the situation is within the security office, there are of course public officials who are prepared to stand for the president, and that's your belief, so you should respect it.Ma can be confused in the case of quite a few bodyguards. So, it seems that he will not be executed today to confuse the president within the current security agency. Another important thing is today's request for attendance for the deputy chief of security. If so, it's difficult to execute the warrant today even if you ask for attendance today. Therefore, so far, Deputy Director of Security Service Kim Sung-hoon has not responded to the request for attendance.Isn't Ma still a little past 10:30? Since we have to wait, we have to take the waiting process, so I think this weekend's execution is quite unlikely for now.

[Anchor]
Both sides say there should be no physical conflict over the execution of arrest warrants. On top of that, the president said that the 55 Guard Corps should carry out its original duty and protect it, and the Ministry of National Defense said that military personnel should not be deployed to execute arrest warrants. What is the legal issue?

[Sonho]
Since it's a politically related issue, there may be people who support each other, there may be parties that support it, and there may be beliefs or ideologies that you are taking. However, if you leave all of these and go to the core of this problem, two things seem to come out. The first is that the president's declaration of emergency martial law is contrary to the Constitution. Also, isn't it a crime under the criminal law? In other words, is it unconstitutional or illegal? There must be a judgment on whether or not. And separately, an arrest warrant issued now and in an enforceable state. Was the request and issuance of this arrest warrant legitimate? I think it's a judgment on this. Therefore, if you look at the position of the 55 Guard Corps as mentioned by the host a while ago, the 55 Guard Corps should do its job. What is the original mission? It's about protecting the president. I'm protecting you. But even if the president is illegal, he has to keep it? I have a question about this. Or even the execution of legally issued warrants against the president should be prevented? It raises a question about this. On the other hand, the 55th Guard said the Ministry of National Defense would not send military personnel to block the execution of arrest warrants, but if you interpret it, it is an unfair act and crime to prevent the legitimate execution of legally issued warrants, so you cannot mobilize military forces there. After all, how will the effect of this arrest warrant be if it goes up to the top? Everything seems to be split after this.

[Anchor]
Breaking news came in while we were talking, so we'll process it and continue the process.

I'll tell you the breaking news that came in a little while ago. It has been reported that he has expressed his opinion that he cannot leave for a moment in relation to the presidential security service as acting security chief at a serious time ahead of his attendance today. The police are expected to consider applying for an arrest warrant if it does not appear in the request for attendance. This is the news that just came in. Kim Sung-hoon, deputy head of the Security Service, said at 10 o'clock that he could not be away for a moment in relation to the presidential security work as acting head of the security service during a severe period, and that he was absent.

[Anchor]
Kim Sung-hoon, the deputy bodyguard, is acting as the bodyguard chief due to the resignation of Park Jong-joon, who was questioned yesterday after being asked by the police for the third appearance. Through officials, they have expressed their position that they cannot be away for a moment.

[Anchor]
Deputy Director Kim is accused of obstructing the execution of an arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk Yeol on the 3rd. Attention is also being paid to whether to apply for an arrest warrant while not responding to today's attendance. We will deliver it in the news that follows. Lawyer, I broke the news, but I didn't attend. They said they couldn't be away for a moment and said they wouldn't attend, what did you think? Did you expect that?

[Sonho]
We've been telling the same story so far, but there will be a difference from former Chief Park Jong-joon. You'll have different positions on the president, you'll have different views on pending issues, and you'll have different roles in stopping the first warrant execution. In a way, it's a guess.Rather, it is possible that a lower-ranking deputy chief played a more leading role than the chief, and also took the lead in leading the workforce with more presidential confidence. Therefore, there was virtually no possibility of responding to the request for attendance in the current situation. He also said that he could not actually leave, which seems to be a position to risk the issuance of an arrest warrant.

However, I will not respond to the execution of the arrest warrant issued. Of course, the subject of the investigation does not judge complying with the warrant. Therefore, the expression of responding to the execution of the warrant itself is not legally correct. The execution of a warrant is just to be beaten. Everyone has no choice but to accept and accept it. But I don't accept this warrant, no. I'll accept that warrant. I even think this kind of attitude itself is a misunderstanding of the warrant system and warrantism.

[Anchor]
However, President Yoon also applied for a power dispute trial and a provisional injunction for suspension of effectiveness to the Constitutional Court, pointing out the illegality and unconstitutionality of the second arrest warrant. Isn't this a very unusual situation?

[Sonho]
There are so many interesting things going on right now.

[Anchor]
We're seeing a series of unusual things.

[Sonho]
But there's something I can understand. Because we're taking these steps with a lot of creative ideas. But there are many possibilities for this as well. As a lawyer myself, the first thing I really have nothing to say. There is a possibility that we should do something because we have nothing more to say. The second is that I have a strong belief. The president legally exercised his power to declare emergency martial law, and it was inevitable, so why don't you know this loyalty? Why can't you understand such patriotic feelings? That's why it's so unfair that I'll do everything I can. Therefore, even if you look at past precedents or interpret the law, you may think that the requirements do not seem to be met well, but at least this is a patriotic heart.

But the president can do that. However, in the case of the president's lawyers, who I respect very much and personally know as great people, in fact, how much do they agree with the president's idea or do they because they have to do it because their client, the president, demands it? Or, as a result, it's a pretty legally disadvantageous situation, so I don't know if I'm trying my best by squeezing out all the ideas. It could be everything. However, in any case, legally, the chances of success of the various measures that the host said just a moment ago are actually very slim. Things like the claimant's eligibility because they do not meet the requirements themselves. I don't think the Constitutional Court's judgment will be that difficult.

[Anchor]
Let's continue talking about the impeachment trial. It's next Tuesday, the 14th. How do you see it when the first formal hearing is held, President Yoon's side argues that the pace of the impeachment trial is too fast. It is a situation in which it refutes one by one while comparing it with the past impeachment trial. What do you think of the situation now?

[Sonho]
It seems that the Constitutional Court is rather than the president's side to refute it one by one. The president insisted that it was too fast. I keep telling you.It's free to argue. It's also not unfounded. You can claim it if you think it's too fast. However, the claims of the respondent's agents themselves are not always correct. Also, it's not always accepted. The lawyer makes the argument, and the judgment is made by the court and the Constitutional Court.

However, looking at the issues that have been revealed so far, the Constitutional Court seems to believe that the current impeachment trial process is not too fast. Because it's an unfortunate thing in the past.Aren't there two precedents for Ma? In the case of former President Roh Moo Hyun, the first hearing was held 18 days after the case was filed. And in the case of former President Park Geun Hye, it was held in 25 days. In the case of former President Park Geun Hye, he also went through three preparations for his defense. However, in this case, the first pleading date is held after the 31st.

[Anchor]
Compared to past impeachment trials, should it be considered that it is not fast? What do you think?

[Sonho]
Doesn't it come out on the screen? It's not that fast just by looking at the numbers. And it's the easiest to compare with the case of former President Park Geun Hye, to understand. At that time, there were many reasons for impeachment included in the impeachment resolution. And it wasn't easy to organize. So, after the hearing preparation period, the types were divided, changed, and subtracted, added, and proceeded through various processes. Nevertheless, it was held in 25 days. But now, the issue is even more politically chaotic and the supporters of both sides are bound to collide.E aside from that, the constitutional matter itself is quite simple. It's quite simple.

That's why it's questionable whether we need this long, and even now, it's not too fast, but I think we've given enough time. Also, the president did not comply with the delivery process. I tried to serve it through various procedures, but I avoided it without receiving it at all. It also took me a while. If so, it is quite questionable how meaningful the Constitutional Court will hear to refute why the process proceeds so quickly.

[Anchor]
Attention is also focusing on whether President Yoon will appear in person on the first formal hearing date next Tuesday, and whether the person will attend or not on the hearing date, and what will be the advantage and disadvantage of the referee?

[Sonho]
I don't know this. This is because the president has never been in the impeachment process. Neither former President Roh Moo Hyun nor former President Park Geun Hye came out. That's why if President Yoon comes to the Constitutional Court and talks about it, how will it affect him? I don't know this in terms of the Constitutional Court. I can guess.It's... But before I tell you that, I guess the reason why the president did not come to the Constitutional Court directly in two cases was to prevent the division of public opinion. Of course, you may not have gone out because you thought it was uncomfortable or unfavorable to stand in the middle of the workshop and exchange arguments.As a result, you have to confront someone, refute them, and attack them, but I guess that situation itself is not good for the public opinion, bad for the country, or divided the public opinion, regardless of the conclusion of the impeachment trial.

From that point of view, I think it's better not to stand this time, either.I don't think President Ma will do that. I think it'll come out. He showed a strong will. And in the first place, there are issues that the president himself himself stated as the background of the declaration of emergency martial law. Publicizing those issues and appealing them to supporters may in itself be what the president wants. Eventually, it looks like he will attend. However, would it be advantageous or disadvantageous for the Constitutional Court to attend and speak directly? I don't see any impact. This is because the constitutional judges of the Constitutional Court already have a clear understanding of what the issue is. And what's the evidence? We need to go through the evidence investigation process in the future.Much of the evidence will already be in the heads of the Constitutional Court justices. If so, whether the president attends or not will not have such a significant impact on the final conclusion of the Constitutional Court, but I think there are factors that cause political conflict among considerable people.

[Anchor]
Lastly, we will briefly look at the special prosecutor's story and wrap it up, lawyer. Isn't President Yoon constantly pointing out the right to investigate? There are talks about the need for a special prosecutor to be launched. How should an unconstitutional element be viewed? What laws should we look at from a legal point of view?

[Sonho]
First of all, it's very important who the special prosecutor will be. That's quite a key issue. Then, if the opposition party, which is currently at odds with the president, effectively appoints a special prosecutor, it can be unconstitutional. There have been issues raised in that area. It seems that the opposition party has a position to resolve part of it with the recommendation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, remove the unconstitutionality by deleting a kind of non-constitutional right, and thus pass it over to the special prosecutor quickly. It seems to be a very important decision.

And on the contrary, haven't you made too many demands so far? It is also possible to point out enough that the bill has been unreasonable and has made it so far. However, with the investigation currently underway, the special prosecutor has to take over various things accordingly when the special prosecutor's law passes and the special prosecutor conducts an investigation. However, this is rather controversial because the need for a special prosecutor itself has already been investigated to a large extent, so the need for a special prosecutor is reduced accordingly. If so, it's right to proceed as quickly as possible and pass it as quickly as possible.

[Anchor]
I see. That's all we've talked about.

So far, I've been talking about the current political issues with lawyer Sohn Soo-ho. Thank you for talking today.